Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 02:50 on 9 June 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article[edit]

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Today's FA[edit]

Tomorrow's FA[edit]

Day-after-tomorrow's FA[edit]

Errors with "In the news"[edit]

Errors in "Did you know ..."[edit]

Current DYK[edit]

The DYK on Fang Yi'ai states "his wife Princess Gaoyang was forced to commit suicide after their failed rebellion". However, there is no mention of suicide in the linked article on Princess Gaoyang, which states: "They stormed the palace but were stopped and captured. Gaoyang and her husband were executed by hanging shortly after." The only mention of a suicide on her page is the category: "Forced suicides of Chinese people". Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. Secretlondon (talk) 14:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't even approved like that. Someone made up another hook as it looked hookier! Secretlondon (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hook that was approved in the DYK hook review is now on MainPage. --PFHLai (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Secretlondon and PFHLai: both hooks were approved in the nomination. Could you please explain the logic of dismissing a hook based on what is in another, much more poorly-written article? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Approved? The reviewer wrote "I can't promote ALT1...." I'm staying away from it. Trouble avoidance. No one is complaining about the original hook. --PFHLai (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PFHLai: I wasn't able to promote ALT1 because it hadn't been approved, but I was able to AGF approve it as it complied with WP:DYKHOOK.--Launchballer 22:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PFHLai, a reviewer cannot promote a hook they approved. This was a fundamental misubderstanding of the DYK process on your part and Secretlondon's. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The actual quote is "I can't promote ALT1 as it introduces new information, but it is AGF sourced, interesting, and short enough" Secretlondon (talk) 23:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK on the Larmanjat guided rail system describes it as being "successfully demonstrated in England", but the demonstration system was actually built in France, according to the article itself. FourteenDays (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The third paragraph in the Lisbon steam tramways section says Sharp Stewart delivered the first locomotive to Buckhurst Hill, Essex, in December 1872, where a length of demonstration track had been laid. Public trials were held ... Performance was satisfactory on the first day, ... Clark, Punchard were authorised to continue construction in Lisbon. Buckhurst Hill, Essex is in England. --PFHLai (talk) 18:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done as not an Error. Schwede66 23:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next DYK[edit]

Next-but-one DYK[edit]

Errors in "On this day"[edit]

Today's OTD[edit]

Tomorrow's OTD[edit]

Day-after-tomorrow's OTD[edit]

Errors in the summary of the featured list[edit]

Friday's FL[edit]

(June 14)

Monday's FL[edit]

(June 10, tomorrow)

Errors in the summary of the featured picture[edit]

Today's POTD[edit]

Tomorrow's POTD[edit]

POTD is missing. 21 hours left to fix it. June 11 and 13 are also not ready yet. Art LaPella (talk) 02:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Any other Main Page errors[edit]

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.