Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

September 11 attacks[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 48JCL TALK 14:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the editors who engaged in the recent edit warring were EC ... upgrading to that level of protection would have no effect on them. If that's what prompted this report, the CTOPS designation allows to impose 1RR instead. Would you prefer that? Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the edit warrimg accounts were Extended-Confirmed, then shouldn't the article be Fully Protected so Extended-Confirmed Users can't edit it? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We only full-protect pages during severe edit wars, and only for a short period of time (like, IME, never longer than a week). 1RR is better when we get to persistent edit warring involving editors at that level. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Redfield[edit]

Ip edits aren't helpful at all. Another IP pops up again and it definitely needs to be protected. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 05:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2735[edit]

Reason: Should get extended protection, as all similar meaningful resolutions on this contentious topic do (e.g. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2720). Risk of vandalism and biased edits is high. CrazyPredictor (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Gandhi[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from at least two IP addresses over the past week. Appear to be focused on whitewashing the article on behalf of the article subject. Geoff | Who, me? 12:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Far-left politics[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A significant portion of edits to this article are unsourced POV and other disruptive edits by IP editors. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at disruption since the last protection regime expired, this is a remarkably stable page for such a reliably controversial topic. I can't myself justify indef semi, but if another admin wants to go there, that's fine with me too. BusterD (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naraz[edit]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Saqib (talk) 14:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. This is likely a notable subject, so I have zero issues with creation if it goes through the draft and NPP review process. BusterD (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lanka Cricket[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Freyam Muhan 14:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Hezonja[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Large frequency of unsourced BLP changes from various IPs (and a joke-username account: DODJIHEZONJA, meaning "HEZONJA, COME [implied: to our club]"), pertaining to recently emerged rumors of his club change, which appeared in tabloids; see exampleAlalch E. 14:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Province of Foggia[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hit by the same kind of vandalism as Foggia, carried out by an IP-hopper. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kusal Mendis[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 15:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]