User talk:ByzantineHistory435
May 2024[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Remsense诉 14:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
ANI notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop[edit]
Please stop mass changing short descriptions on byzantine related pages without consensus. Ratnahastin (talk) 03:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Most of my changes have just been changing the mind you basically derogatory term of "Byzantine emperor/Byzantine empire" to "Eastern Roman Emperor/Eastern Roman Empire". All of my changes make sense and the consensus's have already been going on for years. The term "Byzantine" was made in the 16th century to make the Eastern Romans seem not Roman. However the Eastern Romans were Roman. So instead of going all the way to the extremes "Eastern Roman" is the correct term because it shows how they were Roman, and it shows how they were still different. ByzantineHistory435 (talk) 11:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Still, it is good to get consensus on all the pages you're doing this to. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 14:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ByzantineHistory435 The term "consensus" as used on Wikipedia refers to community WP:CONSENSUS. I am not opposed on principle to the changes you are advocating for. But you don't get to make those kinds of fairly dramatic changes unilaterally. While I agree that the term "Byzantine" is ahistorical, it is nonetheless the WP:COMMONNAME used in the modern English-speaking world when referring to the Empire and its culture. If you want to make an argument to change how we reference it, you will need to open a discussion and request community input. I would suggest Talk:Byzantine Empire, where I see someone has recently raised the issue. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Respectfully, that talk page (and those related) constitutes a brick wall for the East Roman-Byzantine issue. Every so often someone wants to change it and it gets shut down by COMMONNAME after often drawn-out arguments. Unless the academic viewpoint does a complete 180 on the last 300 years of scholarship, that is unlikely to change. Currently, the status quo is to keep whatever the article already says, with the general rule that post-West Roman Empire collapse often uses Byzantine and pre-collapse uses East Roman. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- It gets shut down because we use common names on Wikipedia, period. Our job is not to put forward our preferred nomenclature, it's to use the names that readers will most likely understand and reflect other sources. Remsense诉 23:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ban me from Wikipedia? ByzantineHistory435 (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ban me from Wikipedia than? ByzantineHistory435 (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ByzantineHistory435 If you would rather not edit here, you are free to just move on. We only block people to prevent disruption of the project, and then only when lesser measures have either failed, or as a matter of common sense the editor is not here to build an encyclopedia. That said, I hope you will stay as you obviously have an interest in a subject area where we are not exactly drowning in contributors. Sadly Basil II doesn't get the same traffic as RMS Titanic. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, editors can be banned and, indeed, IP addresses can be blocked if edits are disruptive. You have obviously not worked out how Wikipedia functions. Wikipedia functions by representing relevant scholarship faithfully. Wikipedia does not and cannot create precedents for scholarship to follow, it works entirely the other way around. Being 'right' about a subject in your own eyes does not matter a jot or tittle. Scholarship universally recognises a hiatus, usually placed somewhere between 600AD and 700AD where what is previously called the Eastern Roman Empire becomes the Byzantine Empire. Considering the momentous changes to politics, religion and society in the Mediterranean World that happened in this century it has a good deal of sense behind it. However, any arguments for a continuation of nomenclature are nugatory, because scholarship recognises a break in nomenclature in the period in question - end of. Urselius (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- It gets shut down because we use common names on Wikipedia, period. Our job is not to put forward our preferred nomenclature, it's to use the names that readers will most likely understand and reflect other sources. Remsense诉 23:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Respectfully, that talk page (and those related) constitutes a brick wall for the East Roman-Byzantine issue. Every so often someone wants to change it and it gets shut down by COMMONNAME after often drawn-out arguments. Unless the academic viewpoint does a complete 180 on the last 300 years of scholarship, that is unlikely to change. Currently, the status quo is to keep whatever the article already says, with the general rule that post-West Roman Empire collapse often uses Byzantine and pre-collapse uses East Roman. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ByzantineHistory435 The term "consensus" as used on Wikipedia refers to community WP:CONSENSUS. I am not opposed on principle to the changes you are advocating for. But you don't get to make those kinds of fairly dramatic changes unilaterally. While I agree that the term "Byzantine" is ahistorical, it is nonetheless the WP:COMMONNAME used in the modern English-speaking world when referring to the Empire and its culture. If you want to make an argument to change how we reference it, you will need to open a discussion and request community input. I would suggest Talk:Byzantine Empire, where I see someone has recently raised the issue. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Still, it is good to get consensus on all the pages you're doing this to. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 14:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Stop[edit]
Do not edit against consensus or make mass changes to article descriptions without explanation or seeking consensus.Dozens of recent edits have been, or will be reverted as they were made in a manner that is disruptive. Further disruption of this or similar nature will likely result in the loss of editing privileges. You are a new editor, so some slack is being cut here. But this should be understood as Final 
Warning. Please see the template I am appending below for some helpful hints. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]
Welcome ByzantineHistory435!I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) (Leave me a message) 04:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)