This template is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
It seems a good idea, but... i) there are so many great buildings in Liverpool it might get unwieldy. ii) can we change some of the categories? Some seem a little too vague and catch-all to be meaningful. Highrise/lowrise? Is that really worthwhile?
Perhaps we can discuss categories here. I've started with
Places of worship which seems useful and non-controversial. RodCrosby (talk) 23:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It might be better to produce ones for each topic and nest them in a combined footer. I would suggest the listed buildings should form some groups but there are several thousand Grade II and some buildings would be in multiple cats. Arguably you could also split them by district.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 23:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
