User talk:NegativeMP1
This is NegativeMP1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2 |
WikiCup 2024 March newsletter[edit]
The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.
The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:
- Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
- Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
- AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
- Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
- MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
- Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews
In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.
Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Midnight Animal[edit]
The article Midnight Animal you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Midnight Animal for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 07:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you![edit]
Thank you so much for creating the page on Furina! Your contribution has not gone unnoticed :) Wishibroughtmydogtoclass (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Steve (Minecraft)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Steve (Minecraft) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Herobrine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Furina[edit]
Hey, great job with the Furina article!--Gen. Quon[Talk] 17:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Are you planning any others? I think an article on Nahida would probably be possible.--Gen. Quon[Talk] 14:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Going based on English coverage of the other characters, I'm unsure. I was able to get one made for Paimon around the same time as Furina, but other characters are only really mentioned in game guide content or update announcements. But I'm also yet to do super extensive source searching for characters like Nahida, so never say never. λ NegativeMP1 16:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Are you planning any others? I think an article on Nahida would probably be possible.--Gen. Quon[Talk] 14:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
qwertyuiop[edit]
As an avid believer in Mewing, this user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding Looksmaxxing |
TLAtlak 13:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Paimon (Genshin Impact)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paimon (Genshin Impact) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Paimon (Genshin Impact)[edit]
The article Paimon (Genshin Impact) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paimon (Genshin Impact) and Talk:Paimon (Genshin Impact)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Paimon (Genshin Impact)[edit]
The article Paimon (Genshin Impact) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paimon (Genshin Impact) for comments about the article, and Talk:Paimon (Genshin Impact)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Furina (Genshin Impact)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Furina (Genshin Impact) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gen. Quon -- Gen. Quon (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Furina (Genshin Impact)[edit]
The article Furina (Genshin Impact) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Furina (Genshin Impact) and Talk:Furina (Genshin Impact)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gen. Quon -- Gen. Quon (talk) 15:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Where we dropping boys[edit]
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
For your GA at Tilted Towers and other shenanigans TLAtlak 13:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Furina (Genshin Impact)[edit]
The article Furina (Genshin Impact) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Furina (Genshin Impact) for comments about the article, and Talk:Furina (Genshin Impact)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gen. Quon -- Gen. Quon (talk) 22:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Super Carnage (Hotline Miami, 2012).png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Super Carnage (Hotline Miami, 2012).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Steve (Minecraft)[edit]
The article Steve (Minecraft) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Steve (Minecraft) for comments about the article, and Talk:Steve (Minecraft)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Herobrine[edit]
On 30 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Herobrine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the urban legend Herobrine was ranked on a Guinness World Records poll of the best video game villains, despite never existing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herobrine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Herobrine), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 12:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 7,474 views (622.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2024 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Quarter Million Award and Deletion to Quality Award for Steve[edit]
The Quarter Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Steve (Minecraft) (estimated annual readership: 330,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 03:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |
The Deletion to Quality Award | ||
For your contributions to bring Steve (Minecraft) (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve (Minecraft)) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 03:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC) |
DYK nomination of Furina (Genshin Impact)[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Furina (Genshin Impact) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 10:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Nice award[edit]
. TLAtlak 14:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- I had to get rid of it because some people on the Discord thought I wanted to abuse women or something even though it was a joke, just ignore it λ NegativeMP1 15:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Paimon (Genshin Impact)[edit]
On 3 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paimon (Genshin Impact), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some fans of Genshin Impact have referred to the character Paimon as "emergency food"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paimon (Genshin Impact). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paimon (Genshin Impact)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 01:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pixel Gun 3D[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pixel Gun 3D you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Why are you silencing me?[edit]
I'm not allowed to complain about splatoon at all??? I'm furious because i keep getting shut down left and right and everyone thinks im a troll but theres nowhere else i can complain about this stuff WhereverWeAreNow (talk) 02:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sir, this is Wikipedia. Voicing complaints about a fandom in an aggressive manner is not permitted here. Actually, you shouldn't be discussing the game at all. Please go somewhere else, because Wikipedia is not the place to do this. λ NegativeMP1 02:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Did you even read what i typed? i was suspended from gamefaqs for complaining. they told me i was trolling and also put "The next time you make an account, I suggest you put some more thought into it instead of making it obvious it's just to complain about one thing and leave." < from a gamefaqs mod. I hate mods and admins of sites so much, they're power tripping narcissists WhereverWeAreNow (talk) 02:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? And did you read what I typed? Wikipedia is not the place for this type of complaining. λ NegativeMP1 02:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok then tell me where to go. You better not say what I think you're gonna say WhereverWeAreNow (talk) 02:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know what you think I'm going to say, but not here. λ NegativeMP1 02:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's incredibly frustrating when everyone removes my stuff under WP:NOTFORUM yet when i ask where else to go everyone just shrugs. I NEED somewhere to talk about this but everyone just bans me and removes my stuff and makes things worse WhereverWeAreNow (talk) 02:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know what you think I'm going to say, but not here. λ NegativeMP1 02:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok then tell me where to go. You better not say what I think you're gonna say WhereverWeAreNow (talk) 02:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? And did you read what I typed? Wikipedia is not the place for this type of complaining. λ NegativeMP1 02:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Did you even read what i typed? i was suspended from gamefaqs for complaining. they told me i was trolling and also put "The next time you make an account, I suggest you put some more thought into it instead of making it obvious it's just to complain about one thing and leave." < from a gamefaqs mod. I hate mods and admins of sites so much, they're power tripping narcissists WhereverWeAreNow (talk) 02:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Thank you for participating in the March 2024 backlog drive. Your contribution (4 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC) |
Pixel Gun 3D sources[edit]
I found a small paragraph in the Toronto Sun which adds it used to be called "Pixlgun 3D" and doubled as an unofficial Minecraft skin maker, which led me to this CNET review under the old name. Perhaps these could be useful? — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 13:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the source ideas, but I'm not sure if these will provide any benefit since they're fairly outdated and not relevant to how the game is these days. For example, the game doesn't let you export skins to Minecraft anymore. λ NegativeMP1 18:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cyberdemon (DOOM 1993).png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Cyberdemon (DOOM 1993).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 April newsletter[edit]
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Our current top scorers are as follows:
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
- voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
- Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
- SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
- Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
- Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pixel Gun 3D[edit]
The article Pixel Gun 3D you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pixel Gun 3D for comments about the article, and Talk:Pixel Gun 3D/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 23:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The Core Contest has now begun![edit]
The Core Contest has now begun! Evaluate your article's current state, gather sources, and have at it! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes; although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue work on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings and their prizes. Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
File:Paimon Emergency Food Figures.png listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paimon Emergency Food Figures.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Herobrine you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Herobrine for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cyberdemon (DOOM 1993).png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Cyberdemon (DOOM 1993).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Upcoming inactivity[edit]
I'm leaving this message here so that I will be able to link to it on my userpage when the time comes. I'm going to have significantly reduced activity from around May 22nd to June 2nd, possibly extending from June 3rd to the 14th. I will try to check Wikipedia as much as I can through my inactivity, but since I will be leaving the country and then coming home to deal with some personal life stuff, it will likely take several hours to even days to respond to notices. λ NegativeMP1 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Furina (Genshin Impact)[edit]
On 26 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Furina (Genshin Impact), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the design of Genshin Impact's Furina has elements inspired by classical stories and musicals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Furina (Genshin Impact). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Furina (Genshin Impact)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter[edit]
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
- Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
- SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
- voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Idk how to reply but show proof they were incels by linking it, its a bold claim, and you need to specify.
Your GA nomination of Shipment (Call of Duty)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shipment (Call of Duty) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Requested move for Twitter article[edit]
- Your opinion on this issue is requested
You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views.
𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 06:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Shipment (Call of Duty)[edit]
The article Shipment (Call of Duty) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shipment (Call of Duty) for comments about the article, and Talk:Shipment (Call of Duty)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits (Chris Redfield)?[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I added reliable sourced and reduced editorial bias. Wikipedia articles should be neutral, so I presented viewpoints fairly. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 06:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, but that applies to writing style and not what the sources contain. An opinion that was concluded by numerous reliable sources is not editorial bias. An example would be "X received generally negative reviews from critics" versus "X is a really bad game." Anything that isn't what reliable sources say can arguably fall under WP:OR. I wrote a message on a talk page explaining this.
- The sites that you added are also barely reliable per WP:VALNET, and don't count as significant coverage (articles that go in depth about something are given more weight than a trivial listicle) or towards notability. The way that these articles were added didn't explain much about why they were praised either and the articles don't have much substance to them. λ NegativeMP1 06:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- most of the sources in the reception don't go in depth about Chris Redfield as a character. Kotatsu writers simply said: He is boring. no explanation, nothing. It is a useless source. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- reseption section
- Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- "Yes, Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, but that applies to writing style and not what the sources contain"
- ---> This is not true. Viewpoints should be presented fairly. The editorial bias (reception section) is obvious. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- What is written in secondary sources is what gets put on Wikipedia. I've said this already. If sources are mostly negative about a character, that is what's getting put in, not poorly written content farm articles or user generated polls. See WP:RS. λ NegativeMP1 07:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Could I see the source for your claim (what gets put on Wikipedia)? Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just posted it. WP:RS is an official English Wikipedia policy that states in its very opening sentence "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources." It even supports that minority views can be included if adequately covered (which these are not). It's evident from what I've said on other talk pages as well as that that you're not paying attention to the advice I'm trying to give, and I will not responding to this any further. λ NegativeMP1 07:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've already said it. The sources in the reception section are not reliable and they are biased. The reception section needs editing. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just posted it. WP:RS is an official English Wikipedia policy that states in its very opening sentence "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources." It even supports that minority views can be included if adequately covered (which these are not). It's evident from what I've said on other talk pages as well as that that you're not paying attention to the advice I'm trying to give, and I will not responding to this any further. λ NegativeMP1 07:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've said this already: most sources (reception section) are poorly written content. It needs editing. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Could I see the source for your claim (what gets put on Wikipedia)? Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- What is written in secondary sources is what gets put on Wikipedia. I've said this already. If sources are mostly negative about a character, that is what's getting put in, not poorly written content farm articles or user generated polls. See WP:RS. λ NegativeMP1 07:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- most of the sources in the reception don't go in depth about Chris Redfield as a character. Kotatsu writers simply said: He is boring. no explanation, nothing. It is a useless source. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nuketown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The article Nuketown you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nuketown and Talk:Nuketown/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The article Nuketown you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nuketown for comments about the article, and Talk:Nuketown/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 01:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mirage (CSGO).png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Mirage (CSGO).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fortnite Festival Artwork.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Fortnite Festival Artwork.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Raiden (Metal Gear, Standard Body).png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Raiden (Metal Gear, Standard Body).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)