User talk:Smasongarrison
|
WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE! |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
All Saints' Church[edit]
Can you please tell when I had been told about "changing ... to Kowloon", and elaborate what is wrong to mention Kowloon (given that the territory comprises four components – Kowloon being one of them?) Thanks. 58.152.55.172 (talk) 08:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- You are clearly Wikipedia:HKGW. Mason (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Underwaterbuffalo and WhisperToMe. 58.152.55.172 (talk) 08:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Question about your username[edit]
Just curious: what does the "s" stand for? Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- My legal first name: Sarah. My parents drew inspiration from Sarah Michelle Gellar. Mason (talk) 00:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Law schools in CA[edit]
Hello, curious on this edit. Are these "Lincoln Law Schools" not law schools in California? --Engineerchange (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- The page is, but there's not a need to also classify the WP:EPONYMOUS category as well. There were only three other categories in Category:Law schools in California category, and I don't think everything in the category (or its category) was a law school in california (Wikipedia:Overcategorization). Mason (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I always forget WP:EPONYMOUS. Thanks! --Engineerchange (talk) 01:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
please open a CFD discussion if you're going to be making mass changes to categories and emptying them out[edit]
Also, do you disagree with e.g. greek philosophers in the 13th century being byzantine philosophers? because otherwise I can't imagine why you would remove the Greek philosopher categories from the Byzantine one! Psychastes (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you revert my message, and then start a conversation over here? That seems misleading. Mason (talk) 01:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware how WP:DEFINING works, and I read your message, so I didn't think it was necessary to keep that message on my talk page. You emptying categories out of process, however, is an issue that belongs on your user page. Psychastes (talk) 01:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you've added a lot of Byzantine philosophers to Greek philosopher categories, when many of them aren't defined as being Greek, such as John of Damascus. Typically, we only add people to a nationality category if that nationality is WP:DEFINING for the person. Please review how nationality works before making more categories. Mason (talk) 01:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- on John of Damascus's article, it says
John is at the end of the Patristic period of dogmatic development, and his contribution is less one of theological innovation than one of a summary of the developments of the centuries before him. In Catholic theology, he is therefore known as the "last of the Greek Fathers"
and in my own experience he's referred to as a Greek philosopher as well. I suppose we might disagree on whether that counts as WP:DEFINING or not, but please don't talk to me like I'm somehow unaware of the policy! Psychastes (talk) 01:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- From my perspective it looked like you were massively moving everyone from byzantine philosophers into greek philsophers. Again, I'm glad to know that you know how defining works. Mason (talk) 01:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- more generally, do you disagree that "Byzantine" and "Greek" are somewhat interchangeable terms in the time period? I think there are probably people like John of Damascus who might be on the border of if we want to call them "Byzantine/Greek" at all, but Category:Byzantine people is in Category:Greek people by period, so unless you want to make a massive change to the whole category tree, your edits are almost certainly incorrect. Psychastes (talk) 01:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a very strong opinion on byzantine versus greek. I don't think it is a clear cut issue. But I'd view byztantine as the broader category during its empire's existence. Like I think you could classify anyone in the empire as byztantine, but only people in the area that's now greece as greek. Like I think it would have been more straight forward to place these philosophers into Xth century Byzatine philosophers, instead. Mason (talk) 01:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- well, that's not how the category tree is structured, so if you'd like to change that I'd recommend opening a discussion at CfD. I will probably revert your recent edits based on the fact that they are inconsistent with how all other Byzantine people are categorized currently, unless you want to do so yourself. Psychastes (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I still think it would have been more straight forward if you had created Xth century Byzatine philosophers, instead. FWIW: I already restored the Byzantine categories. Mason (talk) 02:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- im going to restore the people as well. if you want to change the name of the category that's another thing to bring to CFD Psychastes (talk) 02:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I still think it would have been more straight forward if you had created Xth century Byzatine philosophers, instead. FWIW: I already restored the Byzantine categories. Mason (talk) 02:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- well, that's not how the category tree is structured, so if you'd like to change that I'd recommend opening a discussion at CfD. I will probably revert your recent edits based on the fact that they are inconsistent with how all other Byzantine people are categorized currently, unless you want to do so yourself. Psychastes (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have a very strong opinion on byzantine versus greek. I don't think it is a clear cut issue. But I'd view byztantine as the broader category during its empire's existence. Like I think you could classify anyone in the empire as byztantine, but only people in the area that's now greece as greek. Like I think it would have been more straight forward to place these philosophers into Xth century Byzatine philosophers, instead. Mason (talk) 01:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Re recent edit Eric Malthouse page[edit]
Welsh, Scottish, English and Northern Ireland people/artists are all British. Therefore there is a fault with the 20th-century British male artists category as it should contain all Welsh, Scottish, English and Northern Ireland artists. It is an insult to some Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish artists to say they are not British. I hope this problem can be resolved. Neutron6 (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- The Category:20th-century British male artists category does contain all Welsh, Scottish, English and Northern Ireland artists. Each of those is a child category, which means in this case that everyone in those categories is also British. The long standing practice is for those categories to be diffused. No one is saying that Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish artists are not British. Please review the category structure and how diffusion works. Mason (talk) 23:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1995 disasters in Belgium[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1995 disasters in Belgium indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Magical thinking on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Alumni by department[edit]
I believe degrees are technically granted at the College/school lebrl in a university, not at the department level. So my Wayne State degree is from the Collehe of Arts and Sciences, not the History department. Even at that undergrad alumni often range widely in studies, so it often only really makes sense to sub-divide grad student alumni by college or school, and to unify all undergrad alumni . At least at some US universities.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yep that's my understanding of degrees as well. I do think that we can divide up grad alumni more, which would help a lot with those overcrowded categories. But, I'm not sure unifying all undergrad would be helpful as that seems like it would make the categories even more crowded, especially if they're already divided up by school of engineering etc. But, still, it is an interestiong thought. Mason (talk) 04:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- In the case of Harvard University, all undergrads are in Harvard College. There is 1 unified structure for undergrads. It is different at say the University of Michigan, where they do have undergrads in the College of Engineering, etc. However large size is not the worst possible outcome in categories. We want categories to be relevant. For most sports people the degree they got from the university is not going to be defining, and this is actually true for lots of other people. Grad degrees tend more to be defining, although there are exceptions there. Undergrad degrees tend less so. In my own experience as a grad student at Eastern Michigan University, all the courses I took were through the history department. As an undergrad at Wayne State University and elsewhere I took a lot of course through other departments. At my first university close to half of the courses I took were not from the college that the history department was in, maybe even more than half. In fact at my first university since for a time I was trying to do the education tract, I was on a course to essentially get a dual degree since high school education degrees were jointly from one of 4 colleges (physical and mathematical sciences, life sciences <which changed names> , humanities and basically social sciences (which included history and geography). Actually fine arts had education degrees, and when I was there there was also a college of health and human performance that cosponsored education degrees, physical education has since been moved to the college of education, health education was essentially moved to life sciences, dance education to the extent it existed was basically put in Fine Arts <most dance majors were not dance education>, and then a part went to the business school, that was not education related per se. I really think that in general undergrad degrees are not defining enough to be worth categorizing by. With grad degrees, I think it is mainly specific professional program connections we want to categorize by.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Category question: human rights agencies[edit]
Hi Mason, question for you. Is there a category for human rights government agencies, the ones that are charged with administering human rights laws? There is one for "Human rights organizations", with numerous sub-cats, but those strike me as being about groups that lobby for human rights. I think that human rights commissions or agencies are different from that kind of group, but can't find a category for them? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 22:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not that I'm aware of. But that sounds like a great idea! Mason (talk) 22:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t want to do something that results in a CfD again, like my innocent attempt at categories for pre-Confederation lawyers! Would this work?
- There is an existing global category :Human Rights.
- it’s got sub-cats, arranged first by symbols, (which I don’t understand ?), and then alphabetically.
- could I create a general sub-cat, in the alphabetical list? Something like “Category : Human rights enforcement agencies”?
- and then within that subcategory, have an additional sub-sub-cat by country? “Category : Human rights enforcement agencies in Canada”, “Category : Human rights enforcement agencies in the United States” and so on?
- the reason for this approach is that in some countries, notably the US, there will likely be a lot of agencies, so dividing by country will keep it manageable.
- Does this sound workable? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha! Makes sense. What you've written here sounds reasonable in terms of structure and styling and nesting. Let me see if I can find a sibling category. Given me about 5 minutes. Mason (talk) 23:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Plausible sibling families could include: Category:Financial regulatory authorities of the United States... O.o!!!! Category:Human rights ministries, might be good to build off of! Mason (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- What are sibling families, please? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Lol, I meant sibling categories. After digging around I like your suggested category structure. I think it fits well. So the main category would be Human rights enforcement agencies, and for the united states that category would be parented by Category : Human rights in the United States, Government agencies of the United States, Human rights organizations based in the United states. Mason (talk) 00:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I’ll try setting it up. Thanks for the suggestions and encouragement. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- sure thing! Happy to help :) Mason (talk) 00:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- There, I've started it. I've got all of the Canadian articles categorised, some of the US. Added in UK and French. Will do India tomorrow; getting late here. Category : Human rights enforcement agencies. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mason, thanks for fixing up my categories. However, I'm afraid I don't understand the changes, and now I can't seem to link the Indian category properly. The Indian category shows up on the parent page as empty, and the three commissions I've tried to do are listed individually on the parent page: Category : Human rights enforcement agencies. Could you take a look? Thanks. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was trying to mimic what you did with the piping, but I obviously didn't get it right. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Happy to explain. What aspects don't you understand about the additional categories? Like why I added them? Mason (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- In terms of the piping, so piping is used to change how pages/categories are sorted when you look at a category page. You still need to place the page in the category directly. For example, Category:Human rights enforcement agencies in the United States.
- [[Category:Human rights enforcement agencies|united]], uses "united" so that Category:Human rights enforcement agencies in the United States, is sorted by U in that category, so that you can find it compared to the other countries.
- [[Category:Government agencies of the United States|Human rights]], uses "Human rights" so that Category:Human rights enforcement agencies in the United States, is sorted by H in that category, so that you can find it compared to the subject of other agencies
- [[Category:Human rights in the United States| agencies ]] uses " agencies" with a space, so that Category:Human rights enforcement agencies in the United States, shows up at the top of the category, so that you can find it without having to distinguish it from specific human rights.
- [[Category:Human rights organizations based in the United States|agencies ]] uses "agencies" (no space) so that Category:Human rights enforcement agencies in the United States, is sorted by "agency" so that it is intermixed with other organizations. Mason (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have any problems with your changes - it's my lack of technical skills! I started editing the Indian commissions, trying to follow the patterns you used for the Canadian entries, but I couldn't make them work for the Indian ones, so I stopped; didn't want to make things worse. I see you've done some edits to the Indian ones; will take a look and try to wrap my head around this coding. I appreciate your help. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mason, I was doing other stuff yesterday, and I see you've done all the Indian HRts Commissions. Thanks! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have any problems with your changes - it's my lack of technical skills! I started editing the Indian commissions, trying to follow the patterns you used for the Canadian entries, but I couldn't make them work for the Indian ones, so I stopped; didn't want to make things worse. I see you've done some edits to the Indian ones; will take a look and try to wrap my head around this coding. I appreciate your help. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was trying to mimic what you did with the piping, but I obviously didn't get it right. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mason, thanks for fixing up my categories. However, I'm afraid I don't understand the changes, and now I can't seem to link the Indian category properly. The Indian category shows up on the parent page as empty, and the three commissions I've tried to do are listed individually on the parent page: Category : Human rights enforcement agencies. Could you take a look? Thanks. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- There, I've started it. I've got all of the Canadian articles categorised, some of the US. Added in UK and French. Will do India tomorrow; getting late here. Category : Human rights enforcement agencies. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- sure thing! Happy to help :) Mason (talk) 00:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I’ll try setting it up. Thanks for the suggestions and encouragement. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Lol, I meant sibling categories. After digging around I like your suggested category structure. I think it fits well. So the main category would be Human rights enforcement agencies, and for the united states that category would be parented by Category : Human rights in the United States, Government agencies of the United States, Human rights organizations based in the United states. Mason (talk) 00:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- What are sibling families, please? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Plausible sibling families could include: Category:Financial regulatory authorities of the United States... O.o!!!! Category:Human rights ministries, might be good to build off of! Mason (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha! Makes sense. What you've written here sounds reasonable in terms of structure and styling and nesting. Let me see if I can find a sibling category. Given me about 5 minutes. Mason (talk) 23:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t want to do something that results in a CfD again, like my innocent attempt at categories for pre-Confederation lawyers! Would this work?
Wikiproject Medicine May 2024 Newsletter[edit]
- Issue 22—May 2024
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter. I was inspired to collect this after seeing several medicine-interested editors nominate their first good article. Please review a GA nomination if you have time, and help support our colleagues' efforts:
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
- Maintenance category of the month: Articles with topics of unclear notability (I've listed just the 36 that start with "A"; there are 398 total).
- Note for the curious: 24,211 of the 57,554 articles (42%) tagged as part of WP:MED have some maintenance tag.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine at 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC).
Hi[edit]
Hey @Smasongarrison how are you I would like to have a talk with you if you Can help to create notable topic about Translator and journalist , you can see the news on google + here in English and has a multiple coverage Editorinusa (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- It sounds like you have enough resources to make a Wikipedia:Drafts. Mason (talk) 14:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since I don’t have the same permissions as you, can you create a draft of the article? There are also many sources on Wiki Alpha
- and you can see the content there Editorinusa (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- You don't need special permissions to make a draft. You can also just make a draft in your sandbox. Mason (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- “He is a well-known journalist and translator in the Middle East, with extensive coverage in multiple languages.” can you do this favor me this article Editorinusa (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- No I won't make the article for you. You can do it yourself. Asking a well established editor to do it for you is not appropriate as it looks like you're trying to mask that you created it.Mason (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are problems that prevent me from creating the article in short, so I told you :) Editorinusa (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is no reason why you can't create a draft or edit your own sandbox. Mason (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know i have problems thank you for your time Editorinusa (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have problems, you can discuss in the tea house. Further, I would be extremely surprised if you couldn't create a sample page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Editorinusa/Sample_page&redirect=no&preload=Help%3AIntroduction%2Fmain_sandbox&summary=Creating+sandbox&veaction=edit Mason (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know i have problems thank you for your time Editorinusa (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is no reason why you can't create a draft or edit your own sandbox. Mason (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are problems that prevent me from creating the article in short, so I told you :) Editorinusa (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- ok sorry Editorinusa (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi done can you add the sources ? here Editorinusa (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. Clearly you are capable of doing this yourself. Mason (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, so it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive Editorinusa (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. Clearly you are capable of doing this yourself. Mason (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi done can you add the sources ? here Editorinusa (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- No I won't make the article for you. You can do it yourself. Asking a well established editor to do it for you is not appropriate as it looks like you're trying to mask that you created it.Mason (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- “He is a well-known journalist and translator in the Middle East, with extensive coverage in multiple languages.” can you do this favor me this article Editorinusa (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- You don't need special permissions to make a draft. You can also just make a draft in your sandbox. Mason (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Secularism/Irreligion in Nigeria[edit]
Hello Mason, I trust you're doing great. I respect you a lot :) and really appreciate your contributions here. I saw you rolled back an edit made by an IP here and here. I want to acknowledge that I actually saw those edits by the IP and they actually made the categorisation make more sense which I didn't revert them. I respect you and do not want to revert your edit without letting you know. Do you mind undoing yourself or I revert you? (I honestly don't want to, lmao). Regards, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there! Thanks for reaching out, and saying such nice things :D That's good to know you think that the restructure makes more sense. To be honest, my response was more based on experience with the IP who refuses to engage and slow edit wars without engaging in any conversation. If you think the restructure makes more sense, then I think you reverting my changes with a link to this convo (or something like that), would be some I very much support. It would make it clear that you've had a productive role in the conversation, and that other folks have considered the issue. Mason (talk) 13:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll do some of them, but I'd appreciate it if you could help rollout the change elsewhere. I've encouraged a wrinkle. So if I revert both changes then one of the categories is no longer nested within Nigeria. Hmmm... do you have a suggestion for how to fix that? Mason (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, it makes more sense now, like, Category:Secularism in Nigeria being a subcat of Category:Irreligion in Nigeria, since originally, the topic secularism is a subset of irreligion. It was the other way around before, but the IP just corrected it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I just realised that the IP actually did the wrong thing, lol, they're playing on my intelligence, lol. The ideal thing is Category:Irreligion in Nigeria being a subcat of Category:Secularism in Nigeria because irreligion is a subclass of secularism. That was what I did originally, lol. Wikidata says it all irreligion (Q58721) too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- That means, you've to revert yourself again, oh no, I'm so sorry about this, lol. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- lol no worries. 😂😂 I only made the change for Nigeria. Ok... So Secularism should be the parent of irreligion. Also that's a great strategy for see what wikidata has, I hand't thought to look at that. Mason (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Phew… thank god, haha. Thank you so much :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- lol no worries. 😂😂 I only made the change for Nigeria. Ok... So Secularism should be the parent of irreligion. Also that's a great strategy for see what wikidata has, I hand't thought to look at that. Mason (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, it makes more sense now, like, Category:Secularism in Nigeria being a subcat of Category:Irreligion in Nigeria, since originally, the topic secularism is a subset of irreligion. It was the other way around before, but the IP just corrected it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'll do some of them, but I'd appreciate it if you could help rollout the change elsewhere. I've encouraged a wrinkle. So if I revert both changes then one of the categories is no longer nested within Nigeria. Hmmm... do you have a suggestion for how to fix that? Mason (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Last Extension School categories[edit]
Hey there! So I did a quick search and found two other similar categories which I think you should nominate. Category:La Salle Extension University alumni and Category:Harvard Extension School faculty. I think we can allow the faculty category because teaching there can be considered defining but I will leave that up to you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great find! I'll add La Salle to the nom. I'm on the fence about faculty for the reason you noted. Maybe have that as a followup nom depending on how this nom pans out. Mason (talk) 23:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good idea! I'm on the fence about it myself so I agree that we should wait for the alumni one to close before proceeding with the faculty one. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Phonologists[edit]
The Spanksh phonological Category has 1 article. A few others are also under 5. I think if we are going to rename them we probably should also upmerge the small ones.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Mason,
For some reason, you are creating talk pages for categories that have been deleted. These categories have already been deleted and so they don't need talk pages which just have to be deleted a second time. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)