Template talk:Did you know/Approved

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}


This page holds approved nominations that are waiting to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into a Prep area, and from there, prep sets are promoted to a queue, and then to the main page.

To create a new nomination or to see those that are yet to be approved, see Template talk:Did you know. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Click on the link to go directly to the Special occasion holding area.

  If some of the nominations are not showing up properly at the bottom of the page, these alternative pages can be used to view a subset of the most recent nominations.
Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
February 28 1 1
March 14 1
March 25 1 1
March 30 1 1
March 31 1 1
April 5 2 1
April 9 1 1
April 13 1
April 14 3
April 15 1
April 16 1 1
April 17 2 1
April 18 4 4
April 19 2 1
April 20 3 1
April 21 5 2
April 22 1
April 23 1 1
April 24 8 5
April 25 6 2
April 26 10 4
April 27 10 6
April 28 11 7
April 29 10 4
April 30 15 7
May 1 10 7
May 2 8 2
May 3 6 5
May 4 8 5
May 5 9 5
May 6 12 6
May 7 11 7
May 8 11 3
May 9 7 4
May 10 11 6
May 11 6 2
May 12 10 4
May 13 5 2
May 14 10 3
May 15 3
Total 229 113
Last updated 19:17, 15 May 2024 UTC
Current time is 19:37, 15 May 2024 UTC [refresh]

Instructions for nominators[edit]

This page is for those nominations that have already been approved and are waiting to be promoted. If yours has been approved but has not yet been run on the main page, it should either be on this page or will soon be moved here, or already promoted to a Prep area or Queue ahead of an appearance on the main page.

If you wish to create a new nomination, please go to the Template talk:Did you know page; there are instructions there in a section similar to this one on how to nominate an article for DYK.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

Backlogged?[edit]

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until someone promotes it to a preparation area. To alleviate this problem, if the approved page has more than 120 approved hooks, then sets will change twice per day (every 12 hours) instead of once per day (every 24 hours). When the backlog falls below 60 approved nominations set frequency returns to once a day.

Where is my hook?[edit]

If you can't find the nomination you submitted to the nominations page, and it also isn't on this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is either in one of the prep areas, has been promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.

If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Instructions for other editors[edit]

How to promote an accepted hook[edit]

  • See Wikipedia:Did you know/Preparation areas for full instructions.
  • In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote.
  • In another window, open the prep set you intend to add the hook to.
  • In the prep set...
    • Paste the hook into the hook area (be sure to not paste in that that)
    • Paste the credit information ({{DYKmake}} and/or {{DYKnom}}) into the credits area.
    • Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted [[Jane Fonda]]", preview, and save
  • Back on DYK nomination page...
    • change {{DYKsubpage to {{subst:DYKsubpage
    • change |passed= to |passed=yes
    • Add an edit summary, e.g., "Promoted original hook to Prep 3", preview, and save

How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue[edit]

  • Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
  • Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
    • View the edit history for that page
    • Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
    • Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
  • Add a transclusion of the template back to the nominations page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from the nominations page.
  • If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.

Nominations[edit]

Special occasion holding area[edit]

Shortcut
Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section on the regular nominations page, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began, or it was listed as a Good Article; be sure to indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
Note: Articles intended to be held for special occasion dates should be nominated within seven days of creation, start of expansion, or promotion to Good Article status. The nomination should be made between at least one week prior to the occasion date, to allow time for reviews and promotions through the prep and queue sets, but not more than six weeks in advance. The proposed occasion must be deemed sufficiently special by reviewers. The timeline limitations, including the six week maximum, may be waived by consensus, if a request is made at WT:DYK, but requests are not always successful. Discussion clarifying the hold criteria can be found here: [1]; discussion setting the six week limit can be found here: [2].
April Fools' Day hooks are exempted from the timeline limit; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.
Note for promoters: please be sure to add an "invisible" comment after a hook when you've placed it in prep, noting that it's a special occasion hook and including the date it is supposed to run. This should keep the hook from being moved after promotion, as sometimes happens to hooks when a queue needs a slot filled or a prep set needs to be made more balanced by swapping hooks between preps.

May 23[edit]

June 28[edit]

Stonewall Inn

(
)
Exterior of the Stonewall Inn
Exterior of the Stonewall Inn
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 650 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Epicgenius (talk) 12:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Ooh, Stonewall! Article eligibility and condition checks out, became a good article a few days ago. I like the ALT0 here best, though I would suggest linking those names. Assuming good faith on the sourcing. Obviously, going to have to wait til the QPQ is resolved to officially check this off. And I think June 28 would be a wonderful day for this hook. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approved nominations[edit]

Articles created/expanded on February 28[edit]

Kirby: King of Comics

(
)
Jack Kirby
Jack Kirby

5x expanded by OlifanofmrTennant (talk). Self-nominated at 20:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kirby: King of Comics; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Expanded 5x, from 319 to 1614 characters; long enough. Well-sourced, neutral, no plagiarism. I like the first hook; its source is reliable. Great image; I agree that's a better one than the book cover. Well done taking a stub to a short-ish and salvageable article. Good to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Figureskatingfan (talk • contribs) 21:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have pulled this nom from prep, as it fails to include a summary of the book's contents and thus fails WP:DYKCOMPLETE. It also contains at least two errors, one which says Evanier "obtained" artworks from Kirby "while working for him" - he only obtained access, and not apparently while working for him, and another which says the book was met with "positive" reviews when in fact it was panned by The Guardian critic. The article clearly needs more work before it can be featured, if it should be featured at all given the apparent errors. Gatoclass (talk) 09:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass I've begun working on a summary of the books contents, its been a while sinces I've read the book so I'll have to look over it again Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging nominator OlifanofmrTennant, reviewer Figureskatingfan, and promoter PrimalMustelid. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There has been no improvement of the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: I feel that their has been improvement of the article I've just been struggling to find content supported backed up by sources.Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Upon reviewing policy I belive that it would be covered under WP:DYKCITEQuestions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at this. The summary is extremely short, to the point of remaining woefully incomplete. Still fails WP:DYKCOMPLETE. Time to pass on this as the nominator just isn't accepting what they are being told.4meter4 (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@4meter4: I've expanded it a bit how much would be needed? I fear that to much would just be a mini biography of Jack Kirby. It took me a while to begin writing the summary as I didnt have my copy at the time.Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OlifanofmrTennant The summary needs to present a complete but not overly detailed picture of the book's entire plot. It should provide enough detail to give the reader a general picture of the book's contents. It should not be too vague (which it currently is) nor should it be overly detailed. It should be a summary. See MOS:PLOT and Wikipedia:Summary style for guidance. I would suggest removing the bulleted point by chapter. It isn't entirely necessary to break down the content into chapters. It would be better to concentrate on narrative. What is the story being told? Summarize that story. Since this is a biography it should be biographical. Best.4meter4 (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article on summaries for non-fiction such as biographies. It might be helpful to think about how you would summarize the book if you were writing for a summary on the book jacket of the back of the book, or if you were having to write a book summary for an English class, or an abstract for a journal article book review in which a summary is provided as part of a review. All of those require narrative and details but still succinct writing with an overview scope. You should be able to craft one or two paragraps of prose that summarizes the book's narrative arc. 4meter4 (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator has not made any movement on this since the above discussion. It's time to close this for failing WP:DYKCOMPLETE.4meter4 (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have. I've just been struggling to do so as I havent written a book article before.Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took a re-look and I think the summary is now sufficiently in-depth to pass WP:DYKCOMPLETE. I would have preferred a paragraph structure with smoother prose, but that is no reason to hold up a DYK review. All other DYK criteria check out. However, portions of both the Alt1 and Alt2 hook facts are not currently in the article. The quote "nowhere near finished" is not in the article, and there is no mention of a friendship between Evanier and Kirby. For this reason, only the original hook can be promoted.4meter4 (talk) 16:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@4meter4: I made a few new hooks as those arent the best. Also since ALT0 is wrong I rephrased it. Also ALT2 is included now.Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OlifanofmrTennant Please add citations directly after each hook fact. Any sentence with a fact in a hook must have a citation to pass DYK review. In just rechecking Alt2, the sentence with the hook fact lacks a citation and the text that's in quotes in the hook is not in quotes in the article. Is this a quote? If it is it needs to be in quotes in the article's prose. If it's not a quote then it should not be in quotes within the hook sentence. I'm not going to even look at the other hooks until you have fixed this one and can assure me all the necessary citations are in place. Ping me when you are ready.4meter4 (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@4meter4: its there, its the gaurdian source. But reguardless I used the citation again higher in the paragraph.Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant In looking at the Alt2 hook fact, it is not a quote of Evanier directly but it is a quote of The Guardian. The text needs to attribute it to The Guardian in quotes in both the article and the hook, or its a problem with WP:Plagiarism. This needs to be fixed. We can't promote an article with plagiarism issues. Now that I've seen this, I'm going to have to go through all the sources and make sure there aren't other issues of non-attributed text or close paraphrasing. I had trusted the original reviewer had done this, but I'm going to have to re-review with a careful eye on any copyright violations. In the mean time, please put the attributions for this quote in the article. Also, I was asking earlier for you to confirm that all the citations were in place for the many alt hooks you proposed. I don't want to have to keep coming back here and asking again for more citations. Every hook fact must have a citation immediately following the sentence of the hook fact. This may mean we duplicate citations in ways that we may not do when not featuring an article at DYK. This is one of those hoops that DYK requires, even if it seems redundant.4meter4 (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New reviewer needed. I'm not seeing any more close paraphrasing, but I'd like a second set of eyes on this just to make sure I didn't miss anything.4meter4 (talk) 22:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any either. Let's roll.--Launchballer 09:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer, OlifanofmrTennant, 4meter4, and AirshipJungleman29: I'm having to reopening this, as it looks like the point made by Gatoclass above, that the hook mentions that Evanier "obtained" artworks from Kirby "while working for him" was not addressed, and that hook is not supported by the article. All I can see is "Evanier worked for Kirby and was a friend of his, giving him additional insight while writing the book", which isn't the same thing. On a more minor note, the second paragraph of the "Development" section is cited entirely to the book itself, which would be a WP:PRIMARY source. For a statement like "Kirby's family re-obtained the art following a public campaign to have them returned and legal threats from Kirby" I'd think a secondary source highly preferable. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the issues above are still not addressed, this is the third time it's been mentioned now. The only change to the article since my issue was raised above, was to add a couple more cites, but the problem is thathte article does not say anything about him obtaining works from Kirby while working from him. Come on please, the objections need to be addressed directly. Given that this has already been marked as "rejected" twice above and issues still remain more than two months later, it may be getting close to time to archive this and move on.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot approve ALT4, as the article says "additional insight" and the hook says "lots of original art", and these are not the same thing. ALT5 checks out, although a) I just had to merge two sentences together to meet WP:DYKHFC and b) I just had to correct a spelling mistake in the hook. Let's roll.--Launchballer 11:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:DYKIMG, this should probably run without the image. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 25[edit]

Hal Malchow

(
)
  • ... that Hal Malchow briefly worked as a securities lawyer, but left because writing contracts defending against fraud was more boring than scheming them? Source: Issenberg, Sasha (2013). The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. ISBN 9780307954800. p. 2: "except for a brief detour into securities law that ended when he realized that writing the contracts to guard against complex financial schemes was less fun than trying to hatch them."
    • ALT1: ... that Hal Malchow was detained in a Lima, Peru, airport because he was accused of smuggling cocaine in his arm cast? Source: "Three Americans held in Peru pending drug investigation outcome". The Greenville News. Vol. 113, no. 25. AP News. January 25, 1987. p. 3A.
    • Reviewed:
Created by SWinxy (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

SWinxy (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Will be reviewing this one... el.ziade (talkallam) 11:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I did some more searching for some minor biographical facts and came back with a news clipping saying that was too good to pass up. Added as an alt. SWinxy (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The article presents a comprehensive overview of Malchow's life, career, and contributions to political consulting, and meets the newness, length, sourcing, neutrality, and copyvio-free criteria. Offline sources were accepted in good faith. he article and hook meet all the required criteria for inclusion in the DYK section of Wikipedia, with no subjective issues identified. el.ziade (talkallam) 09:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • unpromoted per Special:Diff/1219998585 RoySmith (talk) 13:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Striking ALT1 due to WP:BLP issues; original hook struck because "scheming them" is confusing given the context: what does scheming a contract even mean? Please propose a new hook. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • I strongly disagree with you that ALT1 is "negative" and a BLP issue. The wording is clear that he was accused, not convicted, of smuggling cocaine. It plainly does not violate BLP because it's sourced to the Associated Press, considered generally reliable at WP:RSP. Being accused of smuggling narcotics in an arm cast is unusual, quirky, absurd. ALT1 can be modified slightly to say that Malchow "was once detained" to lessen a perception that crime is Malchow's MO. But I find it odd to read it this way. SWinxy (talk) 18:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • SWinxy, it isn't just me: the consensus I'm seeing in the WT:DYK thread is that ALT1 is both negative and a BLP issue. "Accused" and "detained" both sound bad, and to add "once" would simply be read by most people that it happened in the past, not that it happened to him only once in his life: either way, he's painted as a drug smuggler on Wikipedia's front page. I strongly advise you to come up with an ALT2 that features a different set of facts, since ALT1—though you clearly like it—isn't going to be accepted at DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          • The two concurring with you made their replies before I addressed your claim of it being a BLP issue. It's unfair to mark "consensus!" at the time right before I made my rebuttal to allow my point to be considered, and without responding directly to the rebuttal of the argument you made. I liked it and think it's interesting, yeah. el.ziade seemed to think so too in approving it, PrimalMustelid promoted it, and RoySmith said that I don't see anything in particular that's a problem here in opening it up for discussion. Pinging Schwede66 for completion. Sorry for dragging this out, but I just think it's a fine premise for a hook. Could it be reworded in a way that retains it? SWinxy (talk) 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            • Since I got pinged here, I'll just note that when I raised my original query at WT:DYK, I only had a vague feeling that this might be a problem, but BlueMoonset's response clarified the issue in my mind and I agree with him that ALT1 is unsuitable. RoySmith (talk) 16:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            • Needs ALT2. Schwede66 16:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SWinxy: Any hook ideas? Z1720 (talk) 13:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt2 ... that during his career, Hal Malchow consulted for every Democratic presidential nominee from 1988 through 2004?
Alt3 ... that during his career, Hal Malchow consulted for every Democratic presidential nominee from 1988 through 2004, over 30 senatorial campaigns, and 20 gubernatorial campaigns?
--evrik (talk) 16:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Evrik, I have no objection to either alt2 or alt3. Both are referenced in the Washington Post piece. Thank you for your help! el.ziade (talkallam) 10:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I like that! SWinxy (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So, the ALT2 fact - which is the hook I would approve per WP:DYKTRIM - is only in the lead, and does not have an end-of-sentence citation, and I also don't see where the 1988 nominee is mentioned.--Launchballer 09:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on March 30[edit]

Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by An anonymous username, not my real name (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Anonymous 16:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - issue
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, and is well-sourced, but the source used here has an issue (see Buxton comments below). Possibly hook could be improved (see comment below), a really interesting article John Cummings (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I changed the review status thanks to Bruxton for flagging the issues. John Cummings (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding this nomination. It is a BLP so I am cautious about promoting a hook that seems to imply guilt before conviction. Also the bit in the hook about him being an associate professor... it appears in the lead uncited. In the body it just says "He began teaching at Kyoto's Ritsumeikan" - since it is a hook fact it should be stated in the body directly followed by a citation. The hook is 197 characters so it is 3 under the limit, but also gives too much info. (I also made this reply at DYK). I think we need a new hook that because this is a BLP. Bruxton (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bruxton:, five years later and Ozaki's whereabouts remain unclear, as well as the issue as to whether or not he was ever formally tried or convicted by any government. This source is rather intriguing and it seems quite plausible that he may have been among the militants sentenced to death (he certainly fits their description, but while the article mentions his name, it does not confirm that he was one of them). Without any formal conviction on record, I'm unsure what the hook would even be about, as he was only notable for his alleged IS membership. Perhaps something like "... that a Bangladeshi and Japanese academic, Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki, was captured in Syria and detained in Iraq?"? This is at least somewhat interesting without making any kind of accusation. Anonymous 01:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that before changing his name to Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki, the then-Ritsumeikan University associate professor Sajit Debnath hid his beard with a surgical mask?--Launchballer 02:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alt2 ... that Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki is considered an expert on Islamic finance and economic theory? --evrik (talk) 03:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer ALT1 but let's see what @John Cummings and An anonymous username, not my real name:. If you like either John Cummings, give it a green tick again. Bruxton (talk) 03:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bruxton, evrik, An anonymous username, not my real name, Launchballer, Z1720 I honestly don't know what the right thing to do is here, his article is almost entirely about his radicalisation and militancy but the hooks refer to his academic knowledge and wearing a surgical mask. Which seem kind of coincidental to the main content of the article. Is there anywhere we can ask for wider input? John Cummings (talk) 13:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The deafening silence may mean that not many people care about this nomination. How about this:
  • Alt3 ... that Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki was a Japanese academic born to a Hindu family in Bangladesh who became a leader in the Islamic State?
--evrik (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
evrik If you'd be willing to accept:
  • ALT3a: ... that Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki, an academic in Japan born to a Hindu family in Bangladesh, became a leader in Islamic State?
I can approve it. (Everything's in ref #4.)--Launchballer 08:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's roll.--Launchballer 14:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to everyone for working through this, glad it go to a good place, lets roll indeed :) John Cummings (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on March 31[edit]

Killing of David Ben Avraham

(
)
David Ben Avraham moments before he was killed by an Israeli reservist
David Ben Avraham moments before he was killed by an Israeli reservist
Created by Makeandtoss (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 36 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Makeandtoss (talk) 12:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The DYK hook uses “despite”, which is a word to watch per MOS:EDITORIAL. Maybe change “despite posing no threat” to “when he posed no threat” or something similar. Wafflefrites (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up, noted and changed. Makeandtoss (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be better to use "when" rather than "while"? According to Wikipedia, "while" is also a word to watch:
Words to watch: but, despite, however, though, although, furthermore, while ...
I actually think in this case, the sources support that it was later found there was no evidence that he posed a threat, but if the goal is to make the hook neutral, maybe we should avoid these "words to watch" in the hook. Wafflefrites (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, changed to "when". Makeandtoss (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that David Ben Avraham was only granted Israeli residency after he was killed by an Israeli reservist soldier? starship.paint (RUN) 10:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Source: https://www.timesofisrael.com/disturbing-video-shows-jewish-convert-fatally-shot-by-idf-in-west-bank-posed-no-threat/ Interior Minister Moshe Arbel posthumously approved Israeli residency status for Ben Avraham. “We must learn lessons from this unfortunate incident that took the life of David Ben Avraham and do our best to carry out his last wish to be part of the Israeli people,” the minister said in a statement. “Approving his request does him justice, even if it is too late and under tragic circumstances.”[reply]

Oh, and the image above is non-free. It is not CCTV. It is a body cam. starship.paint (RUN) 10:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint: Thanks for the comment. Being controversial or not is subjective, the original hook is fully sourced to multiple reliable sources, including the Israeli military which certainly does not have a conflict of interest in this case. I stand by the original hook.
As for the picture, it is certainly not copyrighted per WP: For example, "[i]f a security camera mounted in a lobby, recording 24 hours a day, captured a dramatic event, the video could be uncopyrighted." Also as evidenced by this example: [7]. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss: - that is not pre-positioned recording devices, not security camera mounted in a lobby, not information produced by an automated system, such as a CCTV or traffic enforcement camera. It's either a body camera video or even a handphone video. [8] starship.paint (RUN) 14:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Starship.paint: If it is a body cam then it is a "pre-positioned recording devices" and thus uncopyrighted. It is impossible to hold an M4 in a threatening way while holding a phone in the other hand. It is definitely a body cam video. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now that I think about it, running the article at all on DYK would probably not be a good idea. ALT0 would raise concerns about NPOV, but even if those were allayed, it might be a bad look to run a hook about a Palestinian being killed by an Israeli on the main page, even if it was factually true. The content of the article itself may also give pause, especially now when the Gaza conflict is dominating headlines. This might be a case where, even if the article would technically be eligible, it may not be a good fit for DYK given the circumstances. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for expressing your opinion. But again why would there be problems of NPOV when Israel itself has admitted to this POV? If there is no opposing POV, then there is no NPOV issue. The article is well-written and is eligible for DYK. Why do you think it is a "bad look" to run a hook about a Palestinian being killed by an Israeli on the main page, when a DYK about a Ukrainian being killed by a Russian was posted at the height of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in April 2022?: "... that Ukrainian actress Oksana Shvets, who was killed in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, starred in the 2013 joint Ukrainian–Russian television family saga House with Lilies alongside Russian actors?" Makeandtoss (talk) 13:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Had I known about that hook I would have opposed it as well. But for what it's worth, the Israel-Palestine conflict is a much more heated, longer lasting conflict. A hook that basically says "Israel did something bad to a Palestinian" being put on the main page would be a very very bad look for DYK, especially with the ongoing conflict. At the very least it might result in complaints either at WT:DYK or at WP:ERRORS, and at worst it could lead to criticism of the project as a whole. There are some topics that, usually for reasons beyond the control of Wikipedia or editors, are probably not a good fit for DYK and this is probably one of them. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's appropriate for WP to display a double standard given whatever excuse. The article is well-written and is eligible for DYK. Anything other than that is subjective. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: - ALT0 would raise concerns about NPOV - why? It is factual and what have I neglected to mention? NPOV doesn't mean "don't make anyone look bad". starship.paint (RUN) 14:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article reminds me of Murder of George Floyd and that article was featured in Wikipedia’s In the news. Most of the sources that reported on this are actually Jewish sources. I added a detail that he was shot in the lower body (which was reverted). There are some details missing from this English Wiki article. The Hebrew Wikipedia article actually has more details. According to the Hebrew article, he was shot in the lower body, and afterward a tourniquet was applied and they called an ambulance.Wafflefrites (talk) 13:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. @ Narutolovehinata5 This is a perennial topic which I always respond to with the same comment which is we follow policy. We follow Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines and we follow WP:NPOV and WP:Verifiability. As with the rest of wikipedia, DYK is WP:NOTCENSORED. We feature controversial topics like this all the time on the main page in Wikipedia:In the news. Likewise, we have run hooks on even more controversial topics than this one in the past at DYK. Controversy is not a valid reason to reject a hook as long as the article is neutrally written and cited to reliable RS.4meter4 (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The assertion regarding a strict following of WP:NOTCENSORED is incorrect, Content that will appear on the main page is often 'censored' in that it undergoes additional considerations to those that would apply to article space, including WP:ITN. CMD (talk) 06:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that we curate not censor the main page. We curate the main page because there is a limited amount of content that can be featured at any one time. And while we may avoid inflammatory language purposefully at DYK and ITN as part of that curation, I personally have never seen a successful case of outright censorship being enacted against a given topic. Typically we work to find a way to feature eligible articles with sensitive content by modifying the language of how we present those topics on the main page. That said, there may be cases of censorship in the past that I personally am not aware of. If they have happened, they shouldn't have as a matter of policy.4meter4 (talk) 21:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marco Pierre White Jr was rejected, although looking at it now it's hard to argue that as being particularly main page worthy. (I could very much do with you if I ever decide to GA it and try it on again here.)--Launchballer 21:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer, I don't think that's a good example of censorship. In the case of Marco Pierre White Jr I think there is a strong argument to be made based on WP:BLP policy that the hook was not appropriate for the main page. BLP policy is a whole other ball of wax.4meter4 (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Two examples of nominations that were failed at least partly due to the topic itself rather than just the hook(s) are Template:Did you know nominations/Watermelon song and Template:Did you know nominations/Tawhai Hill, Kānuka Hills, Pūkio Stream. I think there have been others as well including at least one Israel-Palestine hook, though I can't remember if the latter was rejected due to the subject itself or if it was due to its neutrality tag. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint: @Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for expressing your concerns and asking for a different hook/angle. As a middle ground perhaps I think we can agree on ALT2: "that Palestinian convert to Judaism David Ben Avraham (pictured) was only granted Israeli residency after he was killed by an Israeli reservist?" Makeandtoss (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be strongly opposed to any hook that even touches the "Palestinian getting killed by an Israeli" angle, and I suspect that any attempts to push such an angle would at the latest result in being yanked from a prep/queue, or a trip to either WT:DYK or WP:ERRORS. For the record, had the incident been about an Israeli being killed by a Palestinian I would have said the same thing. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, WP should not display double standards; if it is okay to feature a hook saying a Ukrainian was killed by Russia, then it should be perfectly fine for a hook to say a Palestinian has been killed by Israel. This pro-western bias is not appropriate and goes against Wikipedia's policies. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It can also be a case of correcting a mistake. In my opinion, that Ukrainian hook should not have run in the first place, at least not with that hook.
I also have to note that it's not unheard of for IP-related articles nominated for DYK to be rejected entirely. See Template:Did you know nominations/Calls for the destruction of Israel, which was rejected based on the presence of a neutrality tag, although the subject matter probably didn't help. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a problem with running a hook on calls for Israel's destruction if the article was normally written without any neutrality tags, heck I would have even reviewed and approved it myself. Why would I let my personal opinions or preferences obstruct Wikipedia processes? It's not a mistake to report on facts; how people feel/interpret/respond to these facts is up to them. I think this is really self-evident that that the Ukraine hook was not a mistake, and neither will this be. Makeandtoss (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we can try to rewrite the hook to help with the DYK nomination? Some articles say “mistakenly killed”:

https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-792999 https://www.jns.org/palestinian-convert-to-judaism-mistakenly-killed-by-idf-in-judea/ https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/03/21/palestinian-who-converted-to-judaism-mistakenly-killed-by-idf/ Wafflefrites (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both mistakenly or deliberately is POV and not appropriate as a hook. Makeandtoss (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment How about a hook that de-emphasizes the broader conflict and avoids Palestine V.S. Israel language:
Alt2 ... that after his death David Ben Avraham was granted Israeli residency as a form of justice by Israeli Minister of Interior Moshe Arbel?

This avoids saying how he died, who was responsible for killing him, whether it was a murder or accident, etc. Given his Hebrew sounding name, it's also not clear he's a Palestinian in the hook. It also leaves the reader wondering how Israeli residency could be considered a form of justice (which is a direct quote from Arbel). All of this to say, it's accurate, neutral, and non-inflammatory. It shouldn't raise anyone's hackles and is still interesting.4meter4 (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about his killing, its circumstances and the context; it’s not a biography; so no, de-emphasizing the killing into some heroic recognition by the state that had killed him is quite honestly extremely inappropriate.Makeandtoss (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Since you aren't willing to tone things down Makeandtoss, it's not happening. DYK is not a summary of an article, and this hook statement is true. It's clear you have an editorial WP:POVPUSH and DYK isn't going to be your WP:SOAPBOX as a matter of principal. You can either accept a non-inflammatory hook to drive traffic and readers to the article you have written or not be featured at DYK Rejecting per Per rule C11 of the suplementary guideline, as the nominator is not willing to craft a hook that isn't sensational and insists on emphasizing violence and Palestinian/Israeli animus. 4meter4 (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update After discussions on the WP DYK talk page, there seems to be more support for ALT3: "...that David Ben Avraham was posthumously granted an Israeli residency after having been killed?", which comes as a compromise solution between opposing views. Also, 4meter4 has expressed his openness for a new reviewer taking over the process. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think ALT3 is good. The article has been updated and is more comprehensive. Feedback was given on the talk page and article improvements made based on talk page feedback. Wafflefrites (talk) 14:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can tell you that ALT3 is short enough, cited, and interesting; "being" is more concise than "having been", but I'll let a promoter make that edit. Let's roll.--Launchballer 15:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: Any idea why I received this message? [9] Makeandtoss (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You got that three minutes after AirshipJungleman29 moved it from DYKNA and then put it back into DYKN. Perhaps the bot picked something up in the interim?--Launchballer 16:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh for Pete's sake, I just realised what the problem is. This nomination has never had an actual full review.--Launchballer 16:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Would you mind doing it? The neutrality has been ensured as there were discussions on the talk page and subsequent edits to the article. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Narutolovehinata5: can you explain under which policy you're saying "I would be strongly opposed to any hook that even touches the "Palestinian getting killed by an Israeli" angle". I can understand being opposed to something on grounds of it being not verified, or it violating NPOV. But we don't simply WP:CENSOR certain viewpoints (when presented in a verifiable and neutral way). VR (Please ping on reply) 11:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There have been concerns in the past about topics that are pushing a particular point of view, or giving that impression, getting backlash. I remember of cases in the past where an article was nominated for DYK but was not allowed to run due to it being seen in bad taste. This happened not too long ago with Russia, which was nominated for DYK. It was ultimately not approved due to having a pending GAR, which ultimately failed anyway and it remained a GA, but even before then there was opposition running Russia on the main page at all due to the war. Having said that, while I am still uncomfortable with the article running, I appear to be in the minority here and will ultimately follow whatever consensus is reached. Having said that, if this is to run and isn't brought to WT:DYK or ERRORS beforehand, I would oppose any suggestion other than ALT3. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh go on then. Long enough, new enough. Already ticked ALT3 above. No maintenance templates found, no copyright concerns, neutrality's dealt with. I absolutely hate the WP:CLUMP of six references for the "grave incident" quote, but that isn't required for DYK. Let's roll.--Launchballer 15:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Is this still ongoing or needs a fix? Makeandtoss (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is on Approved, so it should be promoted soon. (I still hate that WP:CLUMP, but again, not a DYK issue. It should be.) Perhaps if a promoter skips this, they could point out exactly why not.--Launchballer 09:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crossed off the other alts above for clarity, and restating ALT3 here:: "...that David Ben Avraham was posthumously granted an Israeli residency after having been killed?" CMD (talk) 01:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • NPOV says "representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." I have not seen a single news article on this event that doesn't start off by mentioning that Ben Avraham was killed by an IDF soldier. Without that context, the hook doesn't even make sense; is Israel's new immigration policy handing out permanent residencies to random victims of homicide? None of the opposition to these hooks seems to be based on policy, but a desire from the regular editors here to just avoid anything they see as controversial. WT:DYK and ERRORS in relation to any vaguely political topic devolves to the same 10 editors arguing about the same thing until the hook eventually never runs because it's "controversial". AryKun (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fair enough AryKun; which of the above hooks would you suggest, and would you be willing to promote it? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • If it helps, ALT3a: "...that David Ben Avraham was posthumously granted an Israeli residency after being killed by an Israeli soldier?" CMD (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Somehow didn't notice this while replying to AJ, I'm good with promoting 3a as well. AryKun (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be inclined more towards ALT4 than 3a. But in either case I will go with consensus. Makeandtoss (talk) 12:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd suggest ALT4:... that Palestinian Jewish convert David Ben Avraham (pictured) was posthumously granted Israeli residency after being killed by an Israeli soldier?
  • It mentions the facts that make the story notable in the first place and is similar to ALT1 and ALT2, but with less editorializing. I would be fine with promoting it if the others are okay with the hook. AryKun (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 5[edit]

Axel Downard-Wilke

(
)
Axel Downard-Wilke
Axel Downard-Wilke
Moved to mainspace by Marshelec (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Marshelec (talk) 04:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Not "recent", per WP:DYKHOOK: "The hook should include a definite fact that is unlikely to change". Try "March 2024" instead. Otherwise, nice article (although I'm not quite sure how comfortable I am actually reviewing this, given I'm the one that put the hook there!)--Launchballer 08:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Amended hook. Marshelec (talk) 08:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Full review needed.--Launchballer 08:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I'm really sorry to be so anal about this, but there is an outside chance there could be more than one this year, so it should really give the month.--Launchballer 09:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the requirement, and could add the month, but in this case I believe the year is sufficient. As a member of the affiliate that organised the Wikicon, I know that this was the annual Wikicon - ie the only one for 2024. The next one is planned to be in Christchurch in 2025. See m:wiki/Wikimedia_Aotearoa_New_Zealand#Activity:_Annual_National_WikiConference for verification.Marshelec (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Full review needed.--Launchballer 07:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BlueMoonset This is the oldest fully unreviewed nom. Given that I put that hook on the front page, does WP:DYKRR prohibit me from reviewing it?--Launchballer 14:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer, it seems to me that you're involved. The nomination isn't even two weeks old; I wouldn't worry about "oldest fully unreviewed nom"; it will get picked up by someone else soon enough. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article is new and long enough. Sourcing looks good and Earwig raises no concerns. Hook is interesting and sourced in the article. Photo is clear, licensing looks good, and works amazingly with the hook (I'd love to see this as the image hook). QPQ done so we are good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Owing to a concern raised by Aoidh at WT:DYK I've taken the bold step of pulling the hook from prep. A new hook may need to be proposed here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As written, this would deserve {{lead too short}}. Marshelec, would you be able to expand this?--Launchballer 14:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer:Yes, quite right. I have now expanded the lead. Should I also now propose a different hook ? I am still keen to make progress with this nomination :) Marshelec (talk) 07:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Works a treat, though I've given it a trim to comply with WP:LEADLENGTH (there should not be more than two paragraphs for a 1700 word article, and none of his early life contributes to notability). You can either find stronger sourcing for the current hook or propose another one.--Launchballer 08:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure how much water that argument holds, if Wikipedia is the most interesting to a broad audience then that's what we should run with. A transport planner is always going to plan transport - what else does he do. I suggest either ALT1: ... that Axel Downard-Wilke (pictured) designed a system to help cyclists negotiate Christchurch intersections? or ALT2: ... that in 2020, the New Zealand transport planner Axel Downard-Wilke (pictured) led a campaign to have macrons used in Māori place names in Wikipedia articles?.--Launchballer 08:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have also considered a hook about the campaign for using macrons in the Māori place names in Wikipedia, but will leave DYK administrators to resolve whether or not it is appropriate to have a hook about the contribution that the subject has made to Wikipedia. In the meantime, I am exploring alternative hooks, and have just made a relatively small addition to the article that may facilitate a further alternative: ALT3 ...that in 2003 Axel Downard-Wilke (pictured) created a training course about Planning and Design for Cycling that has been regularly delivered for more than 20 years._Marshelec (talk) 08:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do think that if we're not going with ALT0, then the other image should be used instead.--Launchballer 08:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In my view, ALT2 might be more acceptable than the original hook because the original hook directly talked about his Wikipedia career while ALT2 is about Wikipedia but not directly about his editing. Having said that, given possible navel concerns, I will leave it to consensus whether or not to use it, but given one source used is a secondary source (NZ Herald), the sourcing itself shouldn't be an issue. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the image attached to this nomination to the other image from the Infobox of the article. I hope this nomination can proceed, using ALT2.Marshelec (talk) 02:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Review needed for ALTs 1-3.--Launchballer 07:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • All the generic DYK requirements are previously reviewed. Re ALT hooks1-3, none has any corresponding sources listed here. Although they are sourced in the article. ALT 1 reads a tad bit dull IMO. "Designed a system"-feels a bit vague here, especially without any interlinking that could give an idea what sort of "system" it was. Moving to ALT2, it reads interestingly well. It's nicely sourced in the article. And overall a fine blurb. Although, based on the contextual relation, it could be argued that it's redundant to make this hook lengthy with "the New Zealand transport planner" at the beginning. Moving to ALT 3, seems like a better version of ALT1, of course differing in details. However, the source used for winning the award for creation of the training course is fine. I was able to access it via library and it checks out. But the latter source, which deals with the course being regularly delivered for more than 20 years, feels a bit unconventional. The website is ViaStrada, and it's a team/consulting firm. The byline reads "Submitted by." I'm not sure if this firm's blog/website content can be considered fully reliable or independent. We'd need a clearer and better source for that, IMO. I'd not have much issue approving ALT 2 (with a potential trim as pointed above, and also wikilinking to Macron (diacritic), but I'm seeking for second opinions as this is my first DYK review. Regards. X (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ViaStrada is Wilke's employer, and I'd question the dueness of the fact in the article. ALT2a: ... that in 2020, Axel Downard-Wilke (pictured) led a campaign to have macrons used in Māori place names in Wikipedia articles?--Launchballer 20:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approving ALT2a. X (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 9[edit]

Environmental damage of Gaza caused by the Israel–Hamas war

(
)
Created by John Cummings (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

John Cummings (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • With four maintenance tags, this isn't going anywhere. Schwede66 00:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reopening per talk.--Launchballer 15:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again Launchballer, just FYI to whoever reviews this, I've addressed the maintainance tags and done a QPQ with Template:Did you know nominations/KDCD-TV. John Cummings (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Full review needed now that maintenance tags are addressed and QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks BlueMoonset, to the person reviewing it, please ping me with any questions :) John Cummings (talk) 16:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @John Cummings:, I started a review, but didn't get past the first section. I understand that this is a delicate subject, but the opening fails Wikipedia:NPOV. Can you rework the opening section so it a little less "pointy"? --evrik (talk) 21:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi evrik thank you for looking at the article, I realise it is an emotive subject. I believe the intro to be a fair summary of the events and have used the same descriptors for the events as the sources, especially the academic study to try to make the article as accurate as possible. However there are limited sources available given the blockade and ban on journalists entering. I can't find any sources which despute that the destruction has happened or who destroyed the farms and trees. There are some more sources to go through but they mainly focus on the health impacts of the destruction. I've included the only quote I can find from the Israeli government in the body of the article. Can you tell me which words/phrases specifically you think are not balanced and how you would go about changing it? John Cummings (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tone down the hyperbole in the opening. If you can do that, ping me and I'll start the review again. --evrik (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Evrik: (I appreciate I'm butting in, but the page is on my watchlist) I'm not seeing hyperbole in the article, grim as it is; some specifics would be helpful for progressing the article. Richard Nevell (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I edited two items in the article. It looks like the suggestions made here have been implemented and the article is as neutral as it can be. The article has the correct inline citations and it is both long enough and new enough to qualify for dyk. The hook is confirmed, in the article, and interesting. I prefer ALT0 as it introduces the word ecocide which is the subject of the article. The nominator has done a qpq. Regarding the stability of the article - it appears mostly -stable, just the nominator and myself have edited it today. Earwig has been down for me today so I have spot checked sources and did not find evidence of plagiarism. Bruxton (talk) 01:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bruxton thanks very much for assessing it and for your additions to the article. John Cummings (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the hook @Rjjiii: it works and it confirmed with the sources. Bruxton (talk) 04:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bruxton honestly I really dislike this solution, all the sources are very clear on the source of the vast vast majority of the destruction which is Israeli forces using bulldozers and bombs. It currently reads as passive voice with no information on who is doing the destruction. I understand the number of bombs has been taken issue with, my strong preference is:

... that Israel's systematic destruction of 38–48% of trees and farmland in Gaza using bulldozers and bombs has been described as an ecocide? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/mar/29/gaza-israel-palestinian-war-ecocide-environmental-destruction-pollution-rome-statute-war-crimes-aoe

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed at WT:DYK, that hook is not supported by the source. CMD (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in mind that WP:DYKHOOK says The hook should include a definite fact that is unlikely to change. Hooks that talk about a specific number of trees destroyed in an ongoing conflict can't possibly meet that requirement. RoySmith (talk) 12:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RoySmith thanks for explaining this, the fact Israeli forces destroyed them and that they have been accused of ecocide I think both meet that requirement. 13:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipmunkdavis, to take each part of the sentence and quote from the source in "s:

  • that Israel's : " Israel’s onslaught on Gaza’s ecosystems has made the area unlivable" and "satellite data that Israeli military activity had destroyed more than 65 sq km, or 38% of that land"
  • systematic : "Samaneh Moafi, FA’s assistant director of research, describes the destruction as systematic." and "The effects of this systematic agricultural destruction"
  • destruction of 38–48% of trees and farmland in Gaza : " shows the destruction of about 38-48% of tree cover and farmland"
  • using bulldozers and bombs : "farmland destroyed by bombs and bulldozers"
  • has been described as an ecocide? : "led to calls for it to be regarded as “ecocide” and investigated as a possible war crime"

One related question, is it possible to use a second link in the hook to further provide sources? I feel like this is is sufficient but others also state facts to back up the statement as well.

John Cummings (talk) 13:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Individual points may all be sourced, but they should not be synthed together to say something else. CMD (talk) 13:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chipmunkdavis thanks, can I check that you agree that all the invidvidual facts are supported by the source now? Could you describe what you think is synthesised? And what is "something else"? I feel like this sentence is an accurate summary of the facts. Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have put details in the discussion at WT:DYK which I would ask you to refer to, but in general if your hook is trying to connect five different points it is unlikely to be accurate. Another example, not covered by WT:DYK, is you are claiming all 38-48% (not a small range) of the destruction is due to systematic bulldozing and bombing, while in actuality that is the total destruction caused by all actors and actions in the war. CMD (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chipmunkdavis thanks for your reply, its got a bit difficult to keep track of everything when its spread across two pages. Can you say which part you think is unaccurate taking these 5 facts from the source? I know that there is some wood taken for firewood, however this and the other sources are clear, the vast vast majority of the trees have been destroyed by Israeli military "satellite data that Israeli military activity had destroyed more than 65 sq km, or 38% of that land". Would you be happy if the phrase was changed to 'more than 38% of trees and farmland' rather than '38% - 48%'? This would make it a direct quote from the source. My understanding of the % range in the information is simply that no one is allowed to enter Gaza to measure the destruction so the researchers made their study through remote sensing and that the amount of trees used for firewood is negligable and includes trees already felled by Israeli military. John Cummings (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The synthing together of the five facts is the issue, not the individual facts. I suggest picking one in particular, and making a hook about that (although not the bombs and bulldozers one, that's mostly a dramatic turn of phrase, especially as we know they also used tanks). Looking at the article, 38% and 48% are actually separate points, 38% is from a study of farmland, 48% is specifically tree cover, two distinct albeit overlapping measurements. CMD (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chipmunkdavis, thanks for your reply, I'm unsure how I could use only one of the facts and make it a full sentence. Thanks for the suggestions about separating the tree destruction and farmland destruction and catching the use of tanks, I've integrated that into a new Alt. John Cummings (talk) 15:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 16[edit]

United States' Telegraph

(
)
Created by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Wonderful work! I enjoyed reading this (I just love old newspapers! ). Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The fact does sound interesting, but unfortunately, according to Fletcher M. Green in "Duff Green, Militant Journalist of the Old School," Duff Green "denied that he was armed or that he gouged Sparhawk's eyes," and it doesn't help that it was Sparhawk who made the original charge. There's not much of a way to prove that this for sure happened, so a different hook might need to be picked unless I can for sure confirm that this truly happened. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 17[edit]

Boot Monument

(
)
The Boot Monument at Saratoga National Historical Park
The Boot Monument at Saratoga National Historical Park
  • ... that the Boot Monument (pictured) never mentions the name of its honoree because he was a traitor? Source: [12] [13] and Martin, James Kirby (1997). Benedict Arnold, Revolutionary Hero: An American Warrior Reconsidered. New York University Press. ISBN 0814755607
Improved to Good Article status by Relativity (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

‍Relativity ⚡️ 00:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: It has appeared on DYK before, but not in bold print. (See talk page for more details) ‍Relativity ⚡️ 00:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)-->[reply]
  • I'll review this. Have read about this subject before. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Relativity: Nice work. ALT0 is good. I'm not sure ALT1 works however as the source only says that it is Arnold's only monument on American soil whereas the hook seems to apply to all American traitors. I also thought of another potential hook that might be decent: ... that a boot is the only monument in the United States to traitor Benedict Arnold because it "was the only part of Arnold not to later turn traitor"? That would require another reviewer, though. Let me know what you think; but ALT0 is good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with ALT0. Thank you for taking on the review! ‍Relativity ⚡️ 01:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 checks out and would make a good quirky.--Launchballer 09:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 18[edit]

Zapad 2009

(
)
Landing craft Mordowija 782 during Zapad 2009
Landing craft Mordowija 782 during Zapad 2009
5x expanded by Piotrus (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 507 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

PS. I forgot to mention - there are plenty of images available for this hook. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Zapad_2009 --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll want to add one of these to the nom for consideration.--Launchballer 19:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I am not sure how to do it post-nom. But I'd suggest File:Zapad-2009 military exercises.jpg. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By finding another nom that does it successfully and adapting it. I'll leave it to you to add a caption and will call for a reviewer.--Launchballer 15:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Caption: "Landing craft Mordowija 782 during Zapad 2009". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added.--Launchballer 23:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New enough (5x expansion), long enough, well-written. Image is appropriately licensed as far as I can determine. QPQ is done. The hook is interesting and supported by an inline citation but not supported in its current format by what is written in the article. The article is a bit ambiguous on this point. On the one hand it asserts that "[...] it also simulated an amphibious landing in Poland, as well as - and most controversially - a nuclear attack against Poland (hitting Warsaw)." In my reading, this is a claim that the exercise did in fact contain such a simulation. Later, however, it is stated that "Other sources noted that the exercise involved nuclear-capable ballistic missiles (Iskander), but not necessarily a simulation of a nuclear attack on another country." I think this could be easily solved by re-phrasing the first sentence, but it should be resolved before I give the green light. Otherwise all criteria are fulfilled. Yakikaki (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yakikaki: Can I trouble you to suggest an alt hook with a revised wording that I can then review and adopt? I am not sure what exact minor wording change you suggest, but I am pretty sure I'd be fine with it and I'd propose it myself if I wasn't too tired to figure it out myself now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt 1a ... that Russian and Belarussian Zapad 2009 military exercise about repelling a NATO attack might have included simulated nuclear strikes on another country?
@Piotrus and Yakikaki: thoughts? --evrik (talk) 17:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's nothing wrong with the original hook, and Alt 1a doesn't solve the problem. The issue, which I think is very easily fixed, is that the article isn't clear on the point whether it might have included a simulated nuclear strikes on another country, or whether it in fact did. That needs to be clarified. I can then greenlight it. Yakikaki (talk) 18:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yakikaki, The article cites the sources; some of which say this happened and some which are more cautious. Not sure how to word it better than what we already have, both in the hook and in the article. If you think you have a better wording, be bold. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it for you. You'll need another reviewer to do the review again, though. Yakikaki (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Maybe User:Evrik would like to do this? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will approve the original hook. I can't approve my hook, but will leave that for the promoter. 15:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
With sources disagreeing, I don't think we should be front paging one or the other. I'd like to see a completely different hook.--Launchballer 11:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Charles Johnson

(
)
Moved to mainspace by GMH Melbourne (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Full review needed.--Launchballer 06:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is new and long enough. Sourcing looks good though Earwig found a handful of word-for-word similarities with "theage.com.au" source. A minor issue with each of the proposed hooks: ALT0 says that Williams was Victoria's most high-profile prisoner - the body of the article supports that but the sources seem to claim he was just a high-profile prisoner. ALT1 says they threw feces at a member of the jury but the article and sources only say "excrement". Both hooks are interesting however. QPQ is not required so just need hooks fixed and that should be all. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS: Thank you for taking the time to review! I have reworded the article in most cases where Earwig's Copyvio Detector identified an issue but I think a lot of it falls under WP:LIMITED, or are quotes. Let me know if this needs to be addressed further. In paragraph 249 of that source, it mentions Williams as the "highest profile prisoner in Victoria". I have changed the wording of ALT1 from 'feces' to 'excrement' — GMH Melbourne (talk) 03:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very sorry, totally forgot about this nom. Missed the "highest profile" bit in that source so thank you for that info. Both hooks look good so we are GTG. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boyz Unlimited

(
)
Created by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 220 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 15:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • 5x expanded by nom. Article is adequately sourced, no issues arose upon checking. The largest similarity result from Earwig is just due to a quoted passage from a critic. Hooks are interesting, I personally like the first hook and ALT2 the most, but all are good and work. QPQ OK. Nicely done! Good to go. B3251 (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A tag was placed on this for {{tone}}, which I believe I've addressed - a promoter should probably double check this.--Launchballer 11:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of the subtext, but at the same time, it's not immediately obvious that Billy Worth was first in a boyband then was part of a comedy show. I'd suggest making that clearer on behalf of ALT2, not that ALT2 is guaranteed to be picked. PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was there; it was just scrawled across the article. I've reworded it.--Launchballer 14:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Antimonumento 5J

(
)
Antimonumento 5J
Antimonumento 5J
  • ... that the Antimonumento 5J (pictured) was installed to commemorate police repression during a protest in response to Giovanni López's arrest four years ago today and his subsequent death? Source: Milenio[16]: "se realizó un acto de memoria pacífica donde también se develó un antimonumento con el objetivo de no olvidar los actos de opresión que ejercieron las autoridades de seguridad pública en contra de ciudadanos manifestantes durante el 4, 5 y 6 de junio del 2020, protestas que se realizaron en torno al asesinato de Giovanni López a manos de policías municipales de Ixtlahuacán de los Membrillos." (Translation: "an act of peaceful remembrance was held where an anti-monument was also unveiled with the objective of not forgetting the acts of oppression exercised by public security authorities against protesting citizens during 4, 5 and 6 June 2020, protests that took place around the murder of Giovanni López at the hands of municipal police officers of Ixtlahuacán de los Membrillos.")
Moved to mainspace by Tbhotch (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

(CC) Tbhotch™ 07:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Length, date, qpq ok, no close paraphrase found. Image on Commons. Not sure we'd time the DYK to match what the death anniversary, though. --Soman (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend promoting this on 5 June, the anniversary of its installation.--Launchballer 16:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if valid and if required: (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 19[edit]

155 Mercer Street

(
)
155 Mercer Street
155 Mercer Street
  • ... that firefighters were alerted to a fire in their fire station at 155 Mercer Street in Manhattan by a ring-tailed monkey named Jenny throwing billiard balls down a flight of stairs? Source: "One time she woke the sleeping company to a fire in its own building by throwing billiard balls down a flight of stairs." [17]
Moved to mainspace by Found5dollar (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 19 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Found5dollar (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: hinnk (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 20[edit]

September 2023 New York floods

(
)
Created by Tails Wx (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: Well done on the GA review @Tails Wx :) preference for ALT1. Nothing else of note, really. Just ping me if the QPQ is done. ‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 07:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, PSA, I've provided the QPQ above! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 13:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, @Tails Wx. Good to go ‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I quite enjoyed ALT1 but it's not really correct @Tails Wx and PSA: the source includes the quote "the sea lion remained inside the zoo, never breaching the zoo’s secondary perimeter" and is clear that she only managed to escape her enclosure. I've thus struck the hook; it will need rephrasing as ALT1a if it is desired that it runs. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AirshipJungleman29, how about this:
~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 17:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 21[edit]

Dedie Rachim

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 217 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 08:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article new enough and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified (AGF on Indonesian source). QPQ done. Image appropriately licensed. GTG. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Juxlos, Pseud 14, and AirshipJungleman29: Needs an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 22:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can't read a word of it, but let's roll anyway.--Launchballer 02:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrena astragali, Toxicoscordion venenosum

( Comment or view )
Death camas miner bee on a death camas flower
Death camas miner bee on a death camas flower
  • ... that the nectar and pollen of meadow death camas (pictured) and its relatives are so toxic that no bee except the death camas miner bee (pictured) can eat them? Source: Cane, James H. (October 2018). "Co-dependency between a specialist Andrena bee and its death camas host, Toxicoscordion paniculatum". Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 12 (5): 657–662. doi:10.1007/s11829-018-9626-9 Quote: "In this study, T. paniculatum, T. venenosum and co-flowering forbs were sampled for bees at 15 sites along a 900-km-long east–west transect across the northern Great Basin plus an altitudinal gradient in northern Utah’s Bear River Range. Only A. astragali bees were regularly seen visiting flowering panicles of these Toxicoscordion."
    Cane, James H; Gardner, Dale R; Weber, Melissa (2 December 2020). "Neurotoxic alkaloid in pollen and nectar excludes generalist bees from foraging at death-camas, Toxicoscordion paniculatum (Melanthiaceae)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 131 (4): 927–935. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blaa159. Quote: "These two death-camas species are the sole floral hosts of the solitary andrenid bee Andrena astragali Ckll., which in turn was the only bee species (or any other insect) found regularly visiting these flowers across much of the plant’s geographic ranges (Cane, 2018)."
5x expanded by MtBotany (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Since this is a two-article nomination, you need a second QPQ. The hook, article conditions, and eligibility check out, and I don't see any evidence of copyvio. You do need to bold the linked terms, however. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for the information @Generalissima:. Sorry I missed that if two articles are nominated at once it needs two QPQ. Thanks for fixing my formatting errors. I have another review in progress for Cora Babbitt Johnson. I'll try to review another nomination in case it takes longer than I anticipate. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 03:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • @MtBotany: You don't need to wait for the previous review to completely finish before using it as a QPQ, as long as you have done your due diligence in the initial check for the article. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • Another thing for me to learn! Educational evening. Thanks for your attention. I should still do one so I have an extra in my back pocket for next time. I'm looking at improving other plant articles for DYK in time for their blooming seasons. The meadow death camas in my garden are up and getting energy, they will be blooming in Colorado in about a week and I'm seeing current year observations on iNaturalist 🌿MtBotany (talk) 03:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh, yes. This can be approved now. My bad for not stating so. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 14:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Generalissima: If this is approved, can you add the green tick under this comment, so the DYK bot can moved this to the approved list? Z1720 (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Added. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MtBotany, Generalissima, and Z1720: There are too many images on both pages and these are interfering with the table of contents. Can something be done about this?--Launchballer 12:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer, you're going to have to be more specific. Breaks how? I've looked at the pages on both windows and mac machines and I cannot see anything wrong. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I use a standard widescreen monitor and some of the images are to the right of the references, which means there's an unslightly block of whitespace - granted "presentable" is far too nebulous a DYK criterion to be useful but I would suggest some of these should be moved to a WP:GALLERY or moved to the Commons (i.e. removed from the article).--Launchballer 16:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to replicate what you are seeing even on an extremely large monitor of 89x48cm with the browser window filling the whole monitor. Does anyone else see this problem? I suspect this is something in your settings or preferences rather than something that a problem that needs to be fixed. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is a me problem because my settings are all standard, and even testing changing the Thumbnail size in preferences to the highest and lowest settings still generates the same problem on Andrena. Other editors are free to opine.--Launchballer 17:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nxdia

(
)
Created by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 223 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 14:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough, it is neutral and well sourced. Earwig picks up a bit of a quote, but otherwise no close phrasing, so all OK. QPQ is done. Hook is interesting, but I couldn't see a reference to the Singles Chart in the source - could you clariy the chart part of the hook? Thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I kept rewording the hook. Try [19].--Launchballer 18:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Launchballer - hook is good (& citation archived here), all OK Lajmmoore (talk) 09:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer and Lajmmoore: am I missing something, or is the hook just not that interesting? Is there nothing better than "... that a singer sung a song which appeared (fairly low) on a songs chart?" ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The interesting bit is "queer anthem", given that neither Egypt or Sudan are known for positive attitudes to homosexuality.--Launchballer 06:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose. Why is she called English in the lead then? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because I assumed that she was until I wrote the article, and forgot to take that bit out. I think there's some MOS dictum that says nationality should be left out of the first sentence altogether, so that's what I've done.--Launchballer 01:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, I just read MOS:BIOFIRSTSENTENCE and it says to include it. It now says "Egyptian alt-pop musician of Sudanese descent".--Launchballer 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 23[edit]

Joel Breman

(
)
  • Source: "Dr. Joel Breman, a specialist in infectious diseases who was a member of the original team that helped combat the Ebola virus in 1976, died on April 6 at his home in Chevy Chase, Md. He was 87."
NY Times
Created by Thriley (talk), ForsythiaJo (talk), and Spencer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 131 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Thriley (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Newly created article of an ITN Recent Death article, which are still DYK eligible. It's long enough, neutral and well sourced. No sign of close paraphrasing. The hook fact is interesting. But, why doesn't the article link to 1976 Zaire Ebola virus outbreak? QPQ is done. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. I have now made a link to that article. Thriley (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great. That was my only concern. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley, ForsythiaJo, Spencer, and Muboshgu: Hook's a bit person-does-their-jobby, got anything else? (If I had my druthers we'd be running "... that Joel Breman, who was part of the team which combatted the 1976 Zaire Ebola virus outbreak, died while in Chevy Chase?", but I suspect pigs will fly before that gets past WP:DYKGRAT.)--Launchballer 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 that Joel Breman, who helped combat the 1976 Ebola virus outbreak in Zaire, was not expected to return alive by the pilots that dropped him there? Thriley (talk) 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Short enough, cited, and interesting. Let's roll.--Launchballer 16:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on April 24[edit]

Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud

(
)
Kendrick Lamar and Drake
Kendrick Lamar and Drake
Moved to mainspace by Cadenrock1 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 12:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I too prefer ALT2b; it connects their current beef to a specific song from 2013 - nearly a decade ago. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 04:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I've been monitoring this article for a few days now. It is actively being edited. The photos were used at the time of nomination, but have been swapped. Right now, at this moment, the nomination is good to go. --evrik (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes. The songs track the feud. --evrik (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for leading with inquiry. I haven't been a huge fan of the section since its inception, but I admit it has dramatically improved from its uncited and originally researched genesis. A brief summary of song contents is necessary for a longwinded feud like this spanning many years and tracks. Cadenrock1 (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Skeptical Environmentalist

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Arcahaeoindris (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Arcahaeoindris (talk) 22:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: A newly promoted GA which received an appropriate review during the GAN. Overall, everything looks good for ALT0, which I think is definitely the strongest option. I'd make a few tweaks to the wording, though, to make it more concise, define "pie" (since it's not that common as a verb), and remove the identity of the thrower (which doesn't add much as not too many readers will know who he is). That leaves us with ALT0a: ...that an environmentalist threw a pie in the face of the author of The Skeptical Environmentalist? If that works for you, this should be good to go. Sdkb talk 01:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Sdkb:! Your proposed alt is fine with me :) Arcahaeoindris (talk) 09:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Icosian game

(
)
  • ... that although the icosian game was advertised as "a highly amusing game for the drawing room", it was too easy to play and few copies were sold?
  • Source: For quote from 1859 ad, see Turner (1987); for the claims that it was too easy and not successful see Sowell (2001), https://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmnj/vol1/iss24/14 (and note the dates of these are pre-Wikipedia, too early to be circular references)
5x expanded by David Eppstein (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 183 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

—David Eppstein (talk) 06:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Date, expansion, hook, close paraphrase check, QPQ checks out. --Soman (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Jacob Papilaja

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 219 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 08:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. QPQ pending. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: QPQ added. Juxlos (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coulrophilia

(
)
Created by Di (they-them) (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Di (they-them) (talk) 22:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Well that's a quite interesting topic. Everything checks out! Skyshiftertalk 19:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Di (they-them) and Skyshifter: Hold it. What makes Vice and the Mirror reliable?--Launchballer 17:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Gould Stephenson

(
)
5x expanded by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 42 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 08:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Really lovely expansion today, long enough, no plagiarism issues, very interesting hook with a reliable source. Thanks for this! Spaghettifier (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vulcan Bridge

(
)
Converted from a redirect by Kentuckian (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 Kentuckian |💬   13:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article length is good, QPQ not needed, article uses reliable sources and passes GNG, WP:EARWIG turns up with no copyvios. Hook is interesting and backed up by source. Overall, good to go in my opinion! Di (they-them) (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 25[edit]

Stacy Hollowell

(
)
  • ... that between 2006 and 2007, Stacy Hollowell worked for basketball teams in Qatar, China, Bahrain and Lithuania?
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 166 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • @BeanieFan11: Please provide a QPQ, or this nomination may be marked for closure. Z1720 (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • New, long, neutral, mostly well cited, no copyvio. @BeanieFan11: Two questions:
    • Where does the year 2006 for Manama Club come from? (this has 2006 but question the reliability, while asia-basket says 2007 and says they were runner-up in 2007) ... I think adding the first asia-basket source would help unless a more detailed one can be found.
    • Is HoopDirt really a reliable source?
Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hameltion: Hmm... I had thought 2006 from Nola.com: "At LCC International, Hollowell oversaw the program in its first two years of existence, starting in 2007, where he led the team to playoff appearances in both seasons. Before joining LCC, in his only season with the Manama Sports Club, he led his squad to an appearance in the Championship series despite losing their best player." I though "before joining LCC [in 2007]" kind of implied that Manama was the year before, but I guess that's not necessarily the case – I think changing it to 2007 with the asiabasket source would work. As for HoopDirt, it seems to say that it is "Founded, monitored, and run by college coaches." Not sure. Thoughts? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BeanieFan11: My guess is that he was coach for the 2006–07 season, but there's no source that says it directly. I'd add the asiabasket source and just mention the one year we do know, 2007; the hook works either way. Re HoopDirt, I found a couple RSes citing it (WP:UBO) and my concern was mostly just sparked by the site's style. Hook is interesting and passably verified, QPQ present. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lunch (song)

(
)
Converted from a redirect by PSA (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 03:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Generally well-written, sources are okay, hook is interesting. Just a small recommendation, links to Rolling Stone and Coachella 2024 can be added. Good to go! Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 11:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hooks must not be likely to change, and that album's probably going to come out. (Probably.)--Launchballer 23:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 26[edit]

Strategion

(
)
  • Source: At this time, while the Emperor Theodosious [II] was in procession to the public granaries, he was pelted with stones by a hungry populace... Westbrook (2013), p. 10
  • ALT1: ... that the merchants of sheep were allowed to sell their livestock in the Strategion in Constantinople until the first day of Lent? Source: C'est au Strategion...que les merchands de moutons peuvent vendre leurs betes, et cela jusqu'au premier jour de careme. Janin (1950), p. 96
  • Reviewed: Fang Gan
Created by Alessandro57 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Alex2006 (talk) 07:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was created yesterday, so is new enough. It is much more than long enough and properly uses in-line citations. AGF on proper paraphrasing of the offline sources was used. Both hooks are interesting and cited in-line, with the first one being better I think (though perhaps need some commas?). The only thing holding up this review, Alessandro57, is that the QPQ hasn't been done yet. SilverserenC 21:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see that you're still editing, Alessandro57. Were you planning on doing a QPQ review or is this nomination abandoned? SilverserenC 23:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No worries, of course I am planning a QPQ. I am still recovering from last month's two QPQ per hook ... ;-) Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alessandro57 and Silver seren: There are an awful lot of single sentence paragraphs, which should be avoided per WP:PARAGRAPH - granted 'presentable' is nebulous to the point of otiosity but I think some of these can be knocked together.--Launchballer 21:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Silver seren and Launchballer: You were right, done! Alex2006 (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My objection has been resolved.--Launchballer 09:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Kenyon

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Feel free to share your alt blurbs.
Created by Xoak (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Reviewing... New enough, long enough, Earwig's copyvio <1%. Whispyhistory (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... Thank you for this interesting article. It reads well and follows the main refernece closely. QPQ not required. Hook is in article and referenced, but is quite general. Can you think of a more specific hook to her? Whispyhistory (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT1: ... that editions of Josephine Kenyon's book Healthy Babies Are Happy Babies increasingly moved away from their original recommendations of rigid scheduling to "on-demand" scheduling based on the child? Source: Opitz, Donald: 'During the course of the book’s five revisions ... her trend in pediatric advice shifted from an emphasis on following rigid schedules to attending to a child’s “on-demand” schedule.' Possible Alt, 198 characters, suggested by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you... looks good. How about a hook containing 'good housekeeping'? There may be something in this reference p. 102. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approving ALT2... I don't think the quote marks are needed as it appears a common term when I searched literature on the topic. Possibly link the book. The hook is in the article and in the main source. Thank you both. Whispyhistory (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong v Inter Miami

(
)
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first DYK nomination so please remind me if there is anything missing or should be improved. Thanks.
Created by Cypp0847 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

~~ J. Dann 15:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • What a ride that article was. QPQ not needed. Earwig has a high score for copyvio detection, but that's entirely due to Messi's paragraph-long statement in the "Departure and Japan trip" section, which has an inline citation to the flagged source. Referencing is adequate and length/newness criteria fulfilled. Hook is definitely interesting and cited in source, not cited inline as exact phrasing but separately so. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Cypp0847 and Juxlos: I have tagged the article for copyediting, as there are grammar-related issues throughout the article (tenses, for instance, are very often incorrect). This needs to be resolved before a DYK run. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwell–Paradise House

(
)
The Ludwell–Paradise House, Rockefeller's "antique"
The Ludwell–Paradise House, Rockefeller's "antique"
  • Source: Kopper, Philip (1986). Colonial Williamsburg. New York City: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
Created by Pbritti (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Pbritti (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • AGF on offline book source. Article expansion is sufficient and recent, QPQ done. No copyvio is detected, Earwig flags a bibliography item and a direct quote only. Hook is good. To DYKA you go. Juxlos (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rosal, Sutherland

(
)
  • ... that Rosal was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver, shortly before it was deserted entirely?
  • Reviewed:
Created by DandelionAndBurdock (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

-- D'n'B-t -- 16:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, and properly sourced. No QPQ needed. Earwig found no problematic copied wording. Good-enough hook, but one must synthesize a couple pieces of information in the article to obtain it: the "largest township" part is at the end of the town section, dated to the early 19th century, while the "deserted" part is at the end of the "clearance" section. In fact both facts are adjacent in the "Maverick Guide to Scotland" source, with much tighter dating (largest in 1815; cleared between 1814 and 1818) and to avoid problems with WP:SYN the article would benefit from making them adjacent somewhere within it, footnoted to that source. Also, "deserted" is maybe a euphemism for what happened. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks David. What if the sentence in the Town section said "Before the clearance, it was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver"? That would would be consistent with the Maverick Guide guide source and not change up the current before-during-after structure. I could also change the sentence in the Clearance section to say "completely deserted by 1818" to avoid any ambiguity.
I think "deserted" is, from a NPOV, the end result of what happened, it describes what's left. You could say "forcibly depopulated" or something but I think "deserted" is clear enough and used in the sources. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me, "deserted" is an accurate and neutral description of the state of the place now, but not of the process by which it reached that state. How about
  • ALT1 ... that before its inhabitants were evicted, Rosal was the largest of 49 townships in Strathnaver?
but that would require a new reviewer as I can't both propose hooks and approve them. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be happy with that ALT1, (although with the link just saying "Rosal" for preference). -- D'n'B-t -- 19:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was an unintentional omission. I've piped the link as you originally did now. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 short enough, cited, and interesting, though may be worth adding "in Scotland" per WP:DYKINT. Let's roll.--Launchballer 06:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 27[edit]

Albert Wesker

(
)
Created by Greenish Pickle! (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations. Article has been promoted into GA last week (7 days).

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 01:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Reviewing this:
  • 1. Each boldlinked article is new enough.
  • 2. Each boldlinked article is new enough.
  • 3. Every source is reliable and approved by the project.
  • 4. It is presentable.
  • 5. Hook is presented with a reliable source.
  • 6. ALT 2 seems more interesting than the other ones since it involves his creation and portrayal. The other ones seems to be interpretations of third party sources.
  • 7. The two non-free images are given sources.
  • 8. The user has less than 5 DYK nominations found.
  • 9. There are no issues.

Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: If this hook is approved, please post the green tick below, using this code: {{subst:DYKyes}}. If not, please add the question mark below, using this code: {{subst:DYK?}}. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only issue I see is the hook. ALT 2 is the only written from a creator's pespective rather than third party source which will interest more people.Tintor2 (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC) @Greenish Pickle!: Pinging just in case. Sorry for the delay. It's been since I reviewed a DYK nomination. I think I already suggested ALT 2 in discord.Tintor2 (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tintor2 Hey, I mean Alt 2 is fine. I don't have anything to do here actually. If you think Alt 2 is fine then you can replace it now with green tick like the user said above. Thanks. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Gusti Ngurah Jaya Negara

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 222 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new, long enough, neutral and presentable. It cites sources inline. All sources are in foreign language. The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its size is within limit. It is partly cited inline. The sentence ending with "... was laid off in 1998" needs to be cited inline. I understand from the article that he is somewhat the co-mayor. If it is correct, then the hook needs to be altered. Please advise. QPQ was done. CeeGee 11:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CeeGee: Inline citation added. The guy is the mayor - not entirely sure what you meant by comayor, but his running mate became vice mayor. Juxlos (talk) 00:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Juxlos: Thanks for adding the missing reference. The article does not say expilictly that he is the mayor and his mate is the vice mayor. It is said "they", so I understand that both are the mayors. Is it possible to clarifythat in the article? CeeGee 08:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. Everything is fine now. Good to go by AGF. CeeGee 05:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sunlight before signing

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by GobsPint (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GobsPint (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment: The article is relatively short and needs further development before being highlighted; the topic is an interesting one, but the hook could do with being shorter. Perhaps,

Alt1 ... that Barack Obama promised to make bills freely available online for public consultation under Sunlight before signing? Klbrain (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, numerically it's over the limit, but as written, this article would deserve {{no lead}}, and one should be added.--Launchballer 19:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reformatted the article into sections and sommething akin to a weak lead. Feeback is welcoem.GobsPint (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is assuaged.--Launchballer 07:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!GobsPint (talk) 18:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Lots of good comments but nobody appears to have reviewed. So I guess I will take it on.4meter4 (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is new enough. It's long enough even after removing the large blocks of quoted text. Earwig did flag copyright violation, but this was due to the large blocks of quoted text which have been properly attributed and are within policy. No close paraphrasing or copyright found, and the article appears to be within policy in all other measures. Hook fact and length both check out for the original and Alt1 hooks. I leave it to the promoter to decide which hook wording they prefer to promote.4meter4 (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robyn Gigl

(
)
Created by Bridget (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Bridget (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long and new enough, and properly sourced. There are no BLP issues. Both hooks are interesting. ALT0 is properly cited but I'm unsure about ALT1. Waiting on that QPQ. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 15:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi LunaEclipse, I'm definitely leaning more towards ALT0, since it's focused on the critical reception of her work featuring a trans character, rather than the focus solely on the fact that Gigl and her character are trans. I've just added a DYK that I just reviewed. Thanks for taking a look at this! Best, Bridget (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The facts for ALT1 are supported but the phrasing seems a little awkward. How about
  • This one is great, but I'm kind of thinking the same thing as ALT1 – maybe we can come up with a hook that is centered on her literary work (rather than her transition)? Bridget (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) (edited 23:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Elizabeth Seifert

(
)
  • ... that Elizabeth Seifert quit medical school after only one year as she was denied a medical degree due to her gender, went on to publish more than 80 novels in her career?
Created by Xoak (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article created 27 April. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are all interesting and sourced. QPQ is not required. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nellie McCoy

(
)
Created by Silver seren (talk) and FloridaArmy (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 116 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

SilverserenC 22:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Verified that the article is long enough, that there are no plagiarism concerns through the Copyvios tool and spotchecking, and that the hook is sourced in the article. Cunard (talk) 00:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 28[edit]

Anne Griffiths

(
)
  • Source: "one of the first two British women to cross the Antarctic Circle" [22]
  • ALT1: ... that librarian Anne Griffiths was one of the few non-royals invited to Prince Philip's 90th birthday lunch? Source: "In 2011 she was one of the few non-royal guests invited to his 90th birthday luncheon at Windsor Castle." [23]
  • Reviewed: [[]]
5x expanded by Mystery Merrivale (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Mystery Merrivale (talk) 19:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: AGF for paywalled sources. Everything looks solid!  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boroline

(
)
  • ... that the antiseptic cream Boroline was marketed to appeal to nationalistic sentiments?
5x expanded by Sohom Datta (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Sohom (talk) 16:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article recently expanded. No copyvio detected, and QPQ is done. Hook is verified in sources and cited inline. Preference for original hook. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 05:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Lander

(
)
Defusing explosives, 1943, photographed by Lander
Defusing explosives, 1943, photographed by Lander
  • ... that Olga Lander used a fixed 50 mm focal length camera, requiring her to work close to the dangerous war-time subjects she photographed (example pictured)?
Created by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting life and work, on fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I approve the hook, and it goes well with the current trend for short "hooky" wording. I wonder, however, if - since her name doesn't give much clue to where she comes from - some hint at place and/or time might add interest. I found interesting, for example, that she took pics in both world wars. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How about including her photo, which - with a year in the caption - would add some time? It would illustrate the hook perfectly although it is not strictly she who is pictured. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gerda Arendt: I've added the photo as you suggest. Regarding the hook info, if you don't tell them everything, they have to click through to find out, right? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the image which tells what I missed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    adding to approval: the image is licensed and a great illustration of the kind of photos she took. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation of the Communist Party of India

(
)
Banner of the Communist Party of India
Banner of the Communist Party of India
  • Source: Kiran Saxena (1990). Trade Union Movement and the National Movement. South Asian Publishers. p. 128. ISBN 978-81-7003-116-1.
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 380 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Soman (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: This is a very nicely-written and well-researched article, with quite the interesting hook for DYK. Excellent work on this! Only real issue is that it's currently tagged as an orphan, this can be remedied by linking to this article from at least one other article. Ping me once this is done and I'll be happy to approve this. (I'm also not convinced that the picture is necessary for this kind of a hook, but its inclusion is up to the DYK coordinators) Grnrchst (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord Chamberlain's plays

(
)
  • ... that the Lord Chamberlain was the official theatrical censor in England for over 200 years until 1968 with the power to prevent any new play from being performed, often for blasphemy or indecency?
  • ALT1: ... that the Lord Chamberlain's plays are a historical archive of play scripts curated through theatrical censorship that provide a unique insight to attitudes to race and sexuality?
  • Reviewed:
Created by OAnick (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Nick Sheppard (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Launchballer

  • fair point, novice at DYK…is update any good?

Nick Sheppard (talk)

It's customary to propose new ALTs instead of replacing them. Full review needed.--Launchballer 18:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've suggested a possibility of linking for the original alt. Someone else may have a better idea of whether this complies appropriately with best practice for formatting a DYK hook. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: I prefer ALT1 to ALT. The hook length is acceptable for both. ALT has a couple of issues: the title of the article does not appear, but more importantly, the idea of the office's powers is not clearly conveyed: it currently says "for over 200 years until 1968 with the power to prevent ANY new play from being performed". However, those powers were somewhat restricted after 1843, so to say ANY new play could be restricted after 1843 is perhaps misleading. This hook could be rephrased slightly, but at this point, for both reasons, I recommend ALT1 instead. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 23:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peale's Philadelphia Museum

(
)
The Exhumation of the Mastadon
The Exhumation of the Mastadon
  • ... that exhibits at Peale's Philadelphia Museum included the first known skeleton of a mastodon (excavation pictured)? Source: Semonin, Paul (2000). American Monster: How the Nation's First Prehistoric Creature Became a Symbol of National Identity. NYU Press. p. 5 "Charles Willson Peale and his son Rembrandt excavated the first complete skeleton of the American incognitum, or mastodon" "when the mounted skeleton was placed in their Philadelphia Museum for public viewing".
Created by TSventon (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

TSventon (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review:


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I don't see anything in the guidelines about QPQs needing to be done recently, but this one was done in 2021 and hasn't been used as a QPQ by the nominator before. If that's okay, then this nom is good to go. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voorts, thank you for the review, I tried to do a few QPQs before I needed them and they have got rather old. Fortunately WP:QPQ says QPQs do not expire and may be used at any time for a future DYK nomination. TSventon (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Voorts and TSventon: I cannot confirm in any sources that this was the first known skeleton. Maybe first "complete" can be investigated if sources support? I do see a source for "Peale eventually founded the first natural history museum in the United States". But I do not know about the reliability of the source (czasopisma) - that can be investigated for a hook idea, or you can introduce a different hook. Bruxton (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts and Bruxton: I was trying to put the hook in my own words and overdid the paraphrasing. When Semonin says the skeleton was complete I think he meant almost complete so I have reworded the article and the hook. Peale's museum as "the first natural history museum in the United States" is arguable, but would need more work. This argued it was not.

TSventon (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It is difficult to find the hook because it is not explicit in the article. I did find the two parts to the hook in The Peale Mastodon section so ALT1 works. Bruxton (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hook is explicit but unreferenced in the lead, I could add a reference to the Smithsonian article there if that made things clearer. In the body one of the sentences was not immediately followed by a reference, so I fixed that.
By the way, on the first museum, I have seen things like the first successful public museum of natural history, but that would need to be discussed in the article and is not particularly hooky. TSventon (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aza Arnold

(
)
  • ... that within years of Aza Arnold inventing a device to improve cotton roving, it was plagiarized across the United States and Europe?
  • Source: Jeremy, D. J. (1981). Technological diffusion—the case of the differential gear. Industrial Archaeology Review, 5(3), 217–227. doi:10.1179/iar.1981.5.3.217
Created by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. AGF on the offline source. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on April 29[edit]

DellaXOZ

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 225 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 12:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Hook fact checks out to source. Strong preference for ALT0 as more distinctive than ALT1 or ALT2. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Southeast Asia heat wave

(
)
Created by Robertsky (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: recently created, QPQ done, interesting hook that is cited. Looks good to go, but please expand the lede a little bit. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky and PSA: An article with a lede that short would deserve {{lead too short}}, so yeah, what Makeandtoss said.--Launchballer 09:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded the lead, sought to provide an overview without simply repeating country by country. CMD (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Better, although I've just noticed that the Laos and Malaysia sections are pretty short. Possibly worth merging into something like 'Other countries'?--Launchballer 07:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about merging countries, I would expect those sections to be where the article might grow (and where editors who click on DYKs might be tempted to pitch in?). There is some specific reporting, for example Reliefweb page on Malaysia. CMD (talk) 08:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that (at least) the Malaysia section could be expanded somewhat (in fact I'm pretty sure it would deserve {{expand}}).--Launchballer 10:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Yeampierre

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by CaptainAngus (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

CaptainAngus (talk) 01:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Final free-QPQ nom from nominator. Article of sufficient length and newness. Hook interesting and cited in source (well, quoted inline). Earwig detects no copyvio aside from again direct quotes. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evgeniia Subbotina

(
)
  • Source: Shilov, A. A.; Karnaukhova, M. G., eds. (1932). "Субботина, Евгения Дмитриевна" [Subbotina, Evgeniia Dmitrievna]. Деятели революционного движения в России [ru] (in Russian). Vol. 4. Moscow: Society of Former Political Prisoners and Exiled Settlers. p. 1635–1636. OCLC 749336544. С помощью А. Лу. кашевича пыталась 28 янв. 1879 г. бежать; добралась до Иркутска, где была задержана 29 янв. т. г. Признанная ген.-губернаторок виновной в самовольн. отлучке, подвергнута 7-дневн. аресту при Иркутск. тюремн. Зам. к. азатем выслана в Верхоленск (Иркутск. губ.) с ением за ней особ. [...] В 1881 г. переведена в Иркутск, где жила с В. Александровой-Натансон, Принимала вместе с нею участие в денежной помощи и в организации побегов Е. Брешко-Брешковской из Баргузина и Е. Ковальской и С. Богомолец из Иркутск. [With the help of A. L. Kashevich she tried to escape on 28 January 1879; she reached Irkutsk, where she was detained on 29 January of that year. Found guilty of AWOL by the Governor-General, she was subjected to a 7-day arrest at the Irkutsk prison. She was deported to Verkholensk (Irkutsk province) and then deported with a special charge. [...] In 1881, she was transferred to Irkutsk, where she lived with V. Alexandrova-Natanson; she took part with her in providing monetary aid and in organising the escape of E. Breshko-Breshkovskaya from Barguzin and E. Kovalskaya and S. Bogomolets from Irkutsk.]
Created by Grnrchst (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 35 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Grnrchst (talk) 14:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Thanks for creating this. I've read some interesting first person accounts that mention the women Russian exiles. Please tag me once the missing citation is added. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Mary Mark Ockerbloom: I'm confused as to why this claim needs a citation? She collaborated on Lavrov's Vpered, was involved in a Narodnik organisation, was tried in two mass trials of Narodnik revolutionaries and actively organised with other Narodniks for decades. Is it not exceedingly obvious that this was the movement she was involved in? --Grnrchst (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Grnrchst: Yes, but all of that relies on the reader having knowledge of what that movement was and who it involved. For a Wikipedia reader who follows the hook to a topic that they aren't knowledgeable about, none of that is obvious. So I would suggest adding a sentence or phrase later in the body that in which you explicitly use the term Narodnik, with a citation to something that clarifies or at least uses that term. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on April 30[edit]

Bill McNulty

(
)
5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 531 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

– Muboshgu (talk) 03:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Yup this one is definitely good to go. Was expanded the required amount within the allotted time frame. Long enough, well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant and copy-vio free. Earwig pops up low violation %. Article is presentable, sourced well, and QPQ is done. Hook is interesting as well. Def good to go :) Soulbust (talk) 01:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Detroit Lions Pro Bowl selections

(
)
Created by Hey man im josh (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • As a lifelong Lions fan due to watching Barry play in my formative years, I'm happy to review this. The article is new enough, long enough, and well sourced. Tone is neutral, Earwig is clean, and a spot check showed no issues. QPQ not needed. The hook is interesting and well-sourced, but unless I'm missing it, it doesn't appear in the actual article. The prose mentions he shares the team record for selections, and an image caption mentions he was chosen every season he played, but there's nothing about being the first NFL player to play at least ten seasons and be selected each year. @Hey man im josh: if you'll just include the fact in the article's prose and cite the SI article this should be good to go. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well that's embarrassing. I guess I had so many revisions and write ups I somehow accidently left it out altogether!! I've made sure it's now included in the prose. Thanks @DrOrinScrivello. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No worries, happens to the best of us! This is now ready for the Main Page. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 13:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Charge to Keep I Have

(
)
  • Source: "The title of the book is based upon a hymn written by Charles Wesley, 'A Charge to Keep I Have'" - George W. Bush, A Charge to Keep, page x.
  • Reviewed:
Created by Mystery Merrivale (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Mystery Merrivale (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is good, well-sourced, new enough, long enough and free of copyright. I do find the hook to be quite interesting + it is cited. QPQ not required. Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 21:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Poitras

(
)
Created by B3251 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

B3251 (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Not ready yet, nominator needs a QPQ. Also, how is the Aquinian reliable? 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Aquinian is the St. Thomas University (STU)'s student newspaper. Per WP:RSSM as well as general consensus through discussions cited by WP:RSSM, using student media sparingly is generally fine; sometimes it is the only option for certain details/facts, such as in this instance for a general assumption of the subject's age, his connection to the University, and a small detail in the creation process of his book.
I apologize if you find that The Aquinian seems disputed, but because WP:N and WP:GNG has already been established it should be alright using student media for small bits of the article, as this is an instance where better sources couldn't be found. (this only applies to articles whose subject is connected to the University of said student press, of course, in which this case Poitras is). If it helps, STU has a more "official" magazine where Poitras has a small mention here as a journalism professor, and is mentioned here in a third-party provincial newspaper interview with a STU journalism student.
I hope this addresses any concerns! QPQ will be finished soon. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair rationale. Waiting for the QPQ. Ping me when you're done. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LunaEclipse: QPQ added, thank you. B3251 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 12:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of New England Revolution managers

(
)
5x expanded by Brindille1 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Brindille1 (talk) 03:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC). This was not expanded five-fold in the past week (since 24 April), but great work on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Me Da Wikipedian (talk • contribs) [reply]

WP:DYKcheck says this was 866 characters as recently as 26 April and is 6476 now. Full review needed.--Launchballer 15:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Full review:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article was nominated within a week of being expanded fivefold. Article coverage is neutral with the prose being consistently backed by reliable, high-quality sources formatted with inline citations. Earwig shows no copyright violations; top result only borrows spoken quotes. Though it's rather embarrassing to see as a Revs fan, ALT0 is unfortunately the most interesting hook out of the bunch, with ALT2 being second-best. All hooks are sourced and mentioned in the prose. No QPQ requirement necessary for this user. Here's to hoping the Revs can at least get the #1 draft pick next year... in the meantime, this nom is good to go! Aria1561 (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Swain

(
)
Swain in blackface
Swain in blackface
Created by 4meter4 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 76 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

4meter4 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New, substantial, well-written, no plagiarism detected, image correctly licensed (I tweaked the tag to cover 100+ period of public domain); QPQ done. Hook verified AGF. Dahn (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shiva (British band)

(
)
5x expanded by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 226 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 10:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • 5x expansion has been done, sources check out, QPQ completed too. Only minor gripe is that the hook is rather vague but everything looks okay otherwise. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 13:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 1[edit]

Elizabeth Storie

(
)
  • ... that Elizabeth Storie's doctor poured nitric acid into her mouth, causing her teeth to fall out?
  • Source: Elizabeth Storie, The Autobiography of Elizabeth Storie, A Native of Glasgow, Who Was Subjected to Much Injustice at the Hands of Some Members of the Medical, Legal, and Clerical Professions (Glasgow: Richard Stobbs, 1859)
  • ALT1: ... that calomel was a popular medicine that caused mercury poisoning? Source: Haller, John S. “Samson of the Materia Medica: Medical Theory and the Use and Abuse of Calomel: In Nineteenth Century America.” Pharmacy in History, vol. 13, no. 2, 1971, pp. 67–76. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41108706. Accessed 1 May 2024.
  • ALT2: ... that a disabled Scottish seamstress published her autobiography in 1859? Source: Elizabeth Storie, The Autobiography of Elizabeth Storie, A Native of Glasgow, Who Was Subjected to Much Injustice at the Hands of Some Members of the Medical, Legal, and Clerical Professions (Glasgow: Richard Stobbs, 1859)
  • ALT3: ... that a 19th century autobiography by a disabled, working-class Scotswoman combines horror and tales of her spiritual awakening with court documents to convince her readers? Source: Graham Lai, Dana; Nelson, Holly Faith (2024). ""There Was Death in the Powder and He Knew It": Dis/ability and Tactics of Resistance in the Autobiography of Elizabeth Storie". Études écossaises (23). doi:10.4000/etudesecossaises.4925. ISSN 1240-1439.
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I'm completely new to DYK so I'm not sure that these hooks are the best, but I think the topic of the article is interesting - it's about Elizabeth Stories, one of the first disabled women and working class women to publish her autobiography in the UK. The story of how she was disfigured by a doctor dosing her with calomel (mercury) and nitric acid is horrific.
5x expanded by Lijil (talk) and Discott (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Lijil (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Striking ALT1, as it does not contain the expanded article nor any reasonable place to put it. Full review needed.--Launchballer 07:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: LGTM, preference for ALT0 sohom@enwiki 14:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hevearita Gunaryanti Rahayu

(
)
Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 221 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 04:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I'll take this nomination. This is my first DYK review by the way. 750h+ 04:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The page was created by nominator within seven days of nomination. QPQ done. Hook is verified and article adheres to all criteria. Earwig finds no problems. Nom is good to go. 750h+ 04:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto Pölzl

(
)
  • Source: Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, Vol. 40-41. Stiasny Verlag, 1996. p. 157
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 381 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Soman (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough, Earwig notes no notable copyvio. Hook is interesting but on an offline source (Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, Vol. 40-41) so I am assuming good faith. QPQ is completed. Everything seems to check out! Ornithoptera (talk) 05:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lyle Bauer

(
)
5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 259 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Bloom6132 (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Great work on expanding the article! Just the height issue to address and then I'd be happy to pass this. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 05:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Suntooooth: thanks for the review! The source for his height in the infobox is ref 3 (StatsCrew.com) at the very bottom of the box – not that easy to see given the grey background (which I can't change because it's the default). —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologia Pro Vita Sua

(
)
  • Source: "He worked hour after hour, up to sixteen hours in one day - once for twenty-two hours running, on May 20th, with Rivington's man at the door next morning." p. 334, first full paragraph
  • ALT1: ... that after John Henry Newman wrote his Apologia Pro Vita Sua in response to an attack by Charles Kingsley, Kingsley compared Newman to a "treacherous ape" and implied that he was insane? Source: "If I am to bandy words, it must be with sane persons." and "I cannot be weak enough to put myself a second time ... into the power of one who like a treacherous ape, lifts to you meek and suppliant eyes ... " p. 343, first two full paragraphs
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: 2nd nom, so no QPQ needed
5x expanded by Smdjcl (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Smdjcl (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Approved: A very nice article, expanded within the window. Both hooks are good and check out. QPQ not required. I like ALT1 better: would suggest amending ALT0 to something like "the manuscript ready for the printer to collect..." in both hook and article, as the "at Newman's door" is a little confusing and not really idiomatic for someone coming to visit him - you could even cut it in the hook, as the interesting thing is the 22-hour day, not where he handed the manuscript over. Would also suggest reworking, in the article, Newman had been accused of secretly working to convert people to Catholicism while outwardly professing to be Anglican, and this belief persisted even after his conversion to Catholicism in 1845, as he would hardly be accused of outwardly professing Anglicanism after he had publicly converted to Catholicism. Still, none of these points should be an obstacle at this stage. Good work. UndercoverClassicist T·C 05:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@UndercoverClassicist: Thank you for your review and the kind words, and sorry for disappearing for a couple of days! Those two sentences that you pointed out were definitely the ones I had the most difficulty phrasing (my original draft of that second sentence you mentioned implied that he was still Anglican when he wrote the Apologia!). I've rephrased the sentences in the article, hopefully for the better. As for the hooks, I have no preference, so if you prefer alt1, I'm fine just going with that rather than trying to improve alt0. (Also, looking at the source again, it's not clear if it should be "manuscript" or "proof" - I just had "pamphlet" in the article. Probably better just to avoid that altogether in the hook.) Smdjcl (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don Johnson (basketball)

(
)
  • Source: All-American at UCLA (Los Angeles Times) "Eaton and Swen Nater are Johnson’s legacy--two raw seven-footers, with little or no basketball credentials before Cypress, who spent two years with Johnson and went on to lucrative careers in the NBA." (Los Angeles Times) "But when the massive Eaton enters the game, UCLA will shift to a low-post offense and the Bruin fast break will slow to a snail's pace. Eaton is a 23-year-old former master auto mechanic who learned his basketball at Cypress (Calif.) Community College from the same coach—former UCLA backcourt star Don Johnson—who sent the Bruins Swen Nater." (Sports Illustrated) "Not only did both Nater and Eaton play in the NBA, each still holds league records." (Cypress College)
Created by Bagumba (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 106 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

—Bagumba (talk) 10:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was created on 1 May 2024‎‎ is 4,704 characters and nominated two days later. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 193 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 11, 20, 21, and 22 (verifying the hook) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saparinah Sadli

(
)
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 657 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was moved to mainspace on 2 May 2024‎‎ is 5,109 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 108 characters long (ALT1 is 160); both are under 200 character max. and are interesting. Refs 2 (verifying ALT1) and 5 (verifying the main hook) are reliable sources from The Jakarta Post. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 2[edit]

Lock's Quest

(
)

* ... that Lock's Quest featured "some of the best original music in a DS game"?

Improved to Good Article status by GraziePrego (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GraziePrego (talk) 08:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review: (1) article is new enough - nominated 3 days following promotion to GA; (2) article is long enough; (2) promoted to GA so assumed policy compliant; (3) copvio looks OK, with most similar text identified as being in quotes, so no issues; (4) Article is presentable; (5) hooks are both cited to independent source (both with a stated editorial policy), and are cited in the article; (6) Not my area, but both hooks are of interest. I have struck the first hook to create ALT0a below - this is just a minor change to clarify "it was said" rather than "it was". I'll leave it to the Promoter to choose the preferred hook. (7) no image; (8) no QPQ needed; and (9) no other issues detected. Good stuff GraziePrego! ResonantDistortion 22:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT0a: ... that Lock's Quest was said to feature "some of the best original music in a DS game"?
    Minor update: I added a wikilink to "DS" in ALT0a in case the reader is not familiar with the term. ResonantDistortion 08:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central Synagogue (Manhattan)

(
)
Central Synagogue
Central Synagogue
  • ... that the roof of New York City's Central Synagogue was rebuilt using surveillance photographs? Source: Barista, Dave (December 2001). "Tradition restored". Building Design & Construction. Vol. 42, no. 12. p. 24.
    • ALT1: ... that New York City's Central Synagogue is topped by onions? Source: Prial, Dunstan (September 16, 2001). "Central Synagogue in New York City reopened". Jerusalem Post. Associated Press. p. 7.
    • ALT2: ... that New York City's Central Synagogue is topped by onion-shaped domes? Source: Prial, Dunstan (September 16, 2001). "Central Synagogue in New York City reopened". Jerusalem Post. Associated Press. p. 7.
    • ALT3: ... that New York City's Central Synagogue has hosted churches and a mosque? Source: Multiple in article
    • ALT4: ... that the design of New York City's Central Synagogue was intended to allude to the history of Jews in Muslim countries? Source: Sachs, Susan (August 29, 1998). "A Living History of American Judaism". The New York Times.
    • ALT5: ... that Central Synagogue has been continuously used by a congregation for longer than any other synagogue in New York City? Source: Jackson, Kenneth T., ed. (2010). The Encyclopedia of New York City (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 226.
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tad's Steaks
    • Comment: More hook suggestions would be appreciated.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 652 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Epicgenius (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Substantial interesting article, on its way to FA I assume, on plenty of sources, offline sources accepted AGF. The image is licensed and says better what ALTs 1 and 2 say. The original hook is nothing specific to this treasure. My favourite is ALT3. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 3[edit]

Alexander Helfgot

(
)
Alexander Helfgot
Alexander Helfgot
  • Source: Юрий Дойков. А.А. Евдокимов: судьба пророка в России. Акрополь, 1999. p. 129
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 384 past nominations.

Soman (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article new enough and long enough, and moved to main space as indicated in the nomination. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found. The hook is very interesting, cited inline, and verified. AGF on the Russian source. Image appropriately licensed. QPQ done. GTG. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lyceum Theatre (Boston)

(
)
The Martin sisters
The Martin sisters
  • ... that Boston's World's Museum featured a "hall of curiosities" which displayed humans with biological rarities, among them albino sisters Florence and Mary Martin (pictured)?
Created by 4meter4 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 78 past nominations.

4meter4 (talk) 02:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. AGF on the offline sources. Either hook works. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

(
)
Rai Bachchan in 2023
Rai Bachchan in 2023
Improved to Good Article status by Keivan.f (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Keivan.fTalk 18:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article is sufficiently long, well-sourced, and highly presentable. The only suggestion I would offer before confirming is to change "female actor" to "actress" and remove "Bollywood actress" from the beginning of the phrase, as it constitutes repetition. MSincccc (talk) 12:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that Aishwarya Rai Bachchan (pictured) was the first Indian actress to be a juror at Cannes Film Festival? I had prefer this version. Please do make the required changes @Keivan.f. Regards MSincccc (talk) 08:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook has been approved to appear under the Did You Know section for the Main Page. Regards MSincccc (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of the extraterrestrial life debate

(
)
Plato (left) and Aristotle (right) opposed the idea of a plurality of worlds.
Plato (left) and Aristotle (right) opposed the idea of a plurality of worlds.
  • Source: * Crowe, Michael J. (2008). The extraterrestrial life debate Antiquity to 1915: A Source Book. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 8–13. ISBN 978-0-268-02368-3.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Phases of ice
  • Comment: The article talks about a "plurality of worlds" (meaning, other worlds similar to Earth, including local life, that may exist elsewhere), that's just the ancient way to talk about extraterrestrial life. For the hook it may be better to use the terms that any casual reader may understand.
Moved to mainspace by Cambalachero (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 117 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Cambalachero (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - Hook and article wording needs to be changed. It isn't entirely clear from the article if they wanted extraterrestrial life not to exist, versus they just didn't think it actually existed.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: (t · c) buidhe 00:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Actually, it's both things. He didn't think alien life exists, and didn't want (because of his own biases) for it to exist. Yes, perhaps that is faulty logic, but we're talking about ancient Greece. Logic itself was still a recent concept, and some things we know take for granted in discussions (such as a basic scientific method when talking about scientific stuff, or that fallacies make a bad argument) were either new concepts or not created yet. The article makes this clear enough: the way in which the Greeks discussed their ideas, their biases, the slow development of the scientific method, etc. Cambalachero (talk) 17:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Alright then, if the promoter is ok with it I guess it's fine. (t · c) buidhe 01:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cambalachero and Buidhe: As written, this article would deserve {{lead too short}}, can this be expanded?--Launchballer 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Cambalachero (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My objection has been resolved.--Launchballer 14:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North West (rapper)

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 227 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Launchballer 12:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article created 2 May. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 17:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on May 4[edit]

Party of Labour of Basel

(
)
5x expanded by Soman (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 385 past nominations.

Soman (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • . Article is recently expanded 5x, the sentence is cited, and I see no evidence of transvio. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Soman and Femke: As written, this article would deserve {{too many sections}}.--Launchballer 22:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm struggling a bit to come up with an overarching section title for the last 3 section (post-1990 history?). Maybe they can be expanded by a sentence each. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even better.--Launchballer 07:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This should also state explicitly why it has "founded in 1944" in the title when it was founded in 1988, because it took me a while to work it out.--Launchballer 09:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that was part of the name. The lede of the article explains that. --Soman (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Tangora

(
)
Albert Tangora typing
Albert Tangora typing
Albert Tangora
Albert Tangora
5x expanded by B3251 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

B3251 (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Just need QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: QPQ done. Thank you for the review, B3251 (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lin Yu-tang (long jumper)

(
)
Created by Habst (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Habst (talk) 19:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Interesting hook. The hook itself is cited in the article and the article does not have any copyright issues. Good to go. Toadboy123 (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guandimiao

(
)
  • Source: Li, Suting; Campbell, Roderick; Hou, Yanfeng (2018). "Guandimiao: A Shang Village Site and Its Significance". Antiquity. 92 (366). doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.176. (p. 1522)
Moved to mainspace by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Giant panda

(
)
  • ... that the distinctive coloration of the giant panda appears to serve as camouflage in both winter and summer?
  • Reviewed:
Created by Wolverine XI (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Wolverine XI (talk to me) 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Earwig shows a very high score for some sites, but they seem to be WP mirrors. Everything else is fine. AryKun (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 5[edit]

Aurora Rodrigues

(
)
  • Source: "Torturés Sous la Dictature Portugaise, Ils Témoignent Contre L'oubli". La Croix (in French). AFP. 20 April 2014. Retrieved 11 May 2024. Privée de sommeil pendant 16 jours d'affilée et battue jusqu'à en perdre connaissance, Aurora Rodrigues a mis 36 ans à briser le silence sur sa souffrance, et refuse de passer l'éponge sur les crimes de la dictature qui a opprimé le Portugal de 1926 à 1974. [...] Aurora Rodrigues et Fernando Vicente n'ont pas parlé sous la torture. Pourtant, selon le docteur Afonso de Albuquerque, "la majorité des détenus cédait après quatre ou cinq nuits sans dormir", quand les hallucinations provoquées par le manque de sommeil les plongeaient dans un état de terreur et d'extrême fragilité.
Moved to mainspace by Rjjiii (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Rjjiii (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough in mainspace and long enough. QPQ present. A terrifying story with hook fact that checks out to Google Translate. Suggestion for Rjjiii: Put the "two weeks" or 16 days figure in the body in addition to the lead. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

6:16 in LA

(
)
Created by Lk95 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 12:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@LunaEclipse: Looks good to me. If I were to make one adjustment, I would clarify that Hodges is a guitarist. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 13:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Capitolium of Constantinople

(
)
  • Source: Eas vero, quae tam orientali quam occidentali lateri copulantur, quas nulla a platea aditus adque egressus patens pervias facit, veterum usibus popinarum iubebit adscribi. Cod. Theod. XV, 1, 53
  • ALT1 ... that the Capitolium of Constantinople, born as a pagan temple, was later topped by a cross?
  • Source: The use of the Capitolium at Constantinople as a temple of the Triad can hardly have outlasted the closure of pagan temples in the fourth century, and in the early fifth century it had become Christianized at least to the extent of having a cross placed on the top of it... Crawley Quinn & Wilson (2013), p. 147
Created by Alessandro57 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 82 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Alex2006 (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article is well-written and thoroughly sourced. While the current hook is acceptable, the article could benefit from additional hook options to make it more engaging. QPQ review is pending. el.ziade (talkallam) 14:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, @Elias Ziade:, I added a hook and did the QPQ. Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 07:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Alessandro57: for addressing the remaining comments. I am personally not fond of using figures of speech in hooks (temple...born) but the alternative you provided is indeed interesting. I will approve the submission.el.ziade (talkallam) 08:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo @Elias Ziade:, what about:
Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alessandro57, looks great, thanks! el.ziade (talkallam) 13:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Mecca Feast

(
)
George Krugers
George Krugers
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 659 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: QPQ done, well-written article, very interesting hook and image is in the public domain. Looks good to go. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eve (Stellar Blade)

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Kung Fu Man (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New (to GA status), long enough (at 17491 characters of prose), QPQ (not required). This seems alright for DYK, given the GA status. I would prefer ALT1 btw. JuniperChill (talk) 21:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 6[edit]

Tobias and the Angel

(
)
example by Titian
example by Titian
  • ... that, unusually for a religious subject, depictions of Tobias and the Angel usually show his dog?
  • Source: Hall, James, Hall's Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art, 1996 (2nd edn.), John Murray, ISBN 0719541476, page 304
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 240 past nominations.

Johnbod (talk) 01:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

ALT1: ... that depictions of Tobias and the Angel usually show his dog?
really says everything that has to be said, in less space. RoySmith (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it is unusual-and it is very unusual-is the hooky bit. It's a short hook anyway. Johnbod (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The point of a hook is to be short and sweet, and leave just a little mystery, enticing the reader to click through to the article. There's no need to tell people this is a religious subject, that's obvious from the title of the painting. And there's no need to tell them it's unusual, the fact that there's a dog speaks for that itself. RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious - gaming/superhero culture is chock full of angels with no religious context at all, & I'm sure vast numbers of our readers have no opinion at all on the frequency with which dogs appear in Christian religious art. Johnbod (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 5× expansion of 6 May 2024‎ version completed from 898 characters to 4,527 and nominated eight days later (calculating from this version as opposed to the 2 May version makes this just one day late, so I'm willing to invoke WP:IAR). No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 97 characters long (ALT1 is 61); both are under 200 character max. and are interesting. AGF book for ref 7 (verifying the hook) which is offline. QPQ done. Image is free and in the public domain. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freddy McKinney

(
)
Created by Tails Wx (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 14:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work. Just need QPQ. Prefer ALT1. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reuben Solo

(
)
Created by Sdkb (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Sdkb talk 00:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was created on 6 May 2024‎‎‎ is 2,548 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (high confidence of violation due to direct quotes that have all been cited; AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 106 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 4 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source from The Scotsman. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 05:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Veale

(
)
  • Source: Several, including: Harrogate Advertiser: "Hampsthwaite commemorates North Yorkshire’s first female doctor Laura Sobey Veale". Note: This fact has had to be carefully interpreted. It was initially expressed as "the first Yorkshire woman to become a doctor" on the brown plaque, pictured in the article and written by the eminent Harrogate historian Malcolm Neesam. He meant "Yorkshire-born". However it has since been interpreted to mean that she was the first female doctor to practise in Yorkshire, which would be incorrect. Edith Pechey was the first qualified woman doctor to practise in Yorkshire, but she was born in Essex, so to local understanding she was definitely not a "Yorkshire woman" (they are very parochially-minded here). Veale was born in Yorkshire.
  • Reviewed: Sonja van den Ende
  • Comment: Created in userspace over some weeks from 15 March, then moved to mainspace on 6 May.
Moved to mainspace by Storye book (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 105 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Storye book (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was moved to mainspace yesterday, so is new enough. It is far more than long enough and properly uses in-line citations (perhaps even more so than necessary for some sentences). The copyvio detector doesn't find anything other than names of things and quotes that are properly used in the article. The hook is short enough, interesting, and is cited inline. The QPQ has been done and there's no image to review. Looks good to go! SilverserenC 20:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the review, Silver seren Re the "even more so than necessary", you'll find that some experienced editors are doing that for a good reason. For example, if you have a "first" in the article, that is going to be automatically questioned and double-checked, and rightly so. Therefore, it is worth finding as many different, independent sources as possible for that "first" and including them all in the article. There is also the fact that some sources may be accessible to some readers (e.g. readers with a subscription, readers in the UK, etc.) and some source may not be accessible to all (e.g. readers outside the UK or without subscription), so it's worth giving them a few alternative sources. A third reason is that various sources give different aspects to the same fact, and some sources also include extra facts which the editor chooses not to include in the article, but which are extremely interesting. In the cast of historical articles, contemporary sources may give the historical standpoint on the matter. Extra sources containing additional facts may also allow other editors to expand the article. Nothing is wasted in this particular article, and there is a reason for everything. Storye book (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yunxian Man

(
)
Yunxian 1 in the Hubei Provincial Museum, showing skull deformation
Yunxian 1 in the Hubei Provincial Museum, showing skull deformation
  • ... that the skulls of Yunxian Man are "relatively complete" despite being heavily crushed?
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I don't mind if the image isn't used, but I found it very interesting. I will fix the remaining citation needed templates and possibly expand the article more today.
Created by Toadspike (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Toadspike (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Looks to be easily verifiable, but "relatively complete" should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki article. While I would prefer the article be organized into sections, I don't think that's a requirement for DYK. Just resolve the "citation needed" issues first before I approve it. And yes, I do see the comment. PrimalMustelid (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Toadspike I would suggest that the first sentence should mention Yunxian Man, otherwise the article may fail the presentability test. I notice that the article was moved this morning, so it may be a work in progress. TSventon (talk) 15:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both for your comments, I have improved the article to resolve them. It is still a little bit of a work in progress, as there is a lot more information in the sources than I originally anticipated, but I'm going for DYK, not GA, so it should be okay as is :D Toadspike (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article quality's a start, so I'll approve for DYK. PrimalMustelid (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fang Yi'ai

(
)
Created by TheGreatPeng (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

TheGreatPeng (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review below, fascinating work!
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: AGF on foreign language sources – I was able to Google Translate the source page to confirm it, but because that's not a perfect translation, the AGF stands. Proposing a slight rewording in the ALT below to increase hookiness, but either would work. Nomader (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 7[edit]

Ryoko Kui

(
)
Created by Ornithoptera (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 30 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Ornithoptera (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting short article; it is well-sourced and well-written. I prefer the original hook over ALT1. My only suggestion is that mangaka should be unlinked per policy on consecutive Wikilinks and changed to "manga artist" for clarity's sake. Yue🌙 23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lie Kiat Teng

(
)
Lie Kiat Teng
Lie Kiat Teng
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 660 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Length, date, qpq, hook, close paraphrase check ok, image free on commons. --Soman (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terror Train

(
)
Train car used in Terror Train
Train car used in Terror Train
  • Source: Grove, David (2015). Jamie Lee Curtis: Scream Queen. Albany, Georgia: BearManor Media. ISBN 978-1-59393-608-2. OCLC 840902442. (no page numbers because google books lacks pagination, and it's not available anywhere else online)
  • ALT1: ... that the killer in the slasher film Terror Train was played by a Canadian cross-dressing performer with little knowledge about films? Source: Grove, David (2015). Jamie Lee Curtis: Scream Queen. Albany, Georgia: BearManor Media. ISBN 978-1-59393-608-2. OCLC 840902442. (no page numbers because google books lacks pagination, and it's not available anywhere else online)
  • ALT2: ... that the train set in Terror Train was a real Canadian Pacific Railway locomotive? Source: Rockoff, Adam (2016). Going to Pieces: The Rise and Fall of the Slasher Film, 1978–1986. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-786-49192-6. Page 94
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Catalogue of Works of Carl Friedrich Abel
  • Comment: Image should be used for ALT 2. Nominated upon request of author
Improved to Good Article status by MagicatthemovieS (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 20 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I wouldn't go with the image, personally, as ALT2 is the weakest. I prefer ALT1. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Veregge

(
)
Created by ThadeusOfNazereth (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 11:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Always awesome to see more articles on Indigenous topics and personalities on Wikipedia! Everything seems to check out. It's new enough, long enough, sourced and neutral. Earwig detects no plagiarism. Hook is cited and interesting! QPQ has been completed! Cheers! Ornithoptera (talk) 21:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kortnei Johnson

(
)
Johnson at the 2018 NCAA DI Indoor Championships
Johnson at the 2018 NCAA DI Indoor Championships
  • Reviewed: No needed.
Created by Habst (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

— Habst (talk) 20:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Comment: I added an alternative hook since the American state is mentioned twice so it won't be classified as redundancy. Also, "home town" is combined since it's one word.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Good nomination hook, added a comment about it (look above), and no-unlikely violation from Earwig. Good job. — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 02:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JuanGLP, thank you, I prefer your hook so I have struck mine. Also, the reason for "unlikely" from Earwig is because the 22.5% similarity is coming from a quote in the "Career" section, properly enclosed in quotes and attributed via citation. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Thanks, --Habst (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To eliminate redundancy of the word "train", perhaps the last three words "to train on" could be removed? --Habst (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Habst, yep there is no problem with Earwig, good thing it's cited with adequate sourcing. Also, good eye for the redundancy part of "train" and have fixed the nominated hook. Just checked it off as approved, and congrats if promoted! — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 23:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Christiaan Koningsberger

(
)
Minister of Colonies: Doel, HW van den. "Koningsberger, Jacob Christiaan (1867-1951)" (in Dutch). Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands. Archived from the original on 20 July 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 661 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was moved to mainspace on 7 May 2024‎ is 6,909 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (high confidence of violation due to publication titles; AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 156 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 2 and 4 (verifying the hook) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peggy Pond Church

(
)
  • Source: "Late in 1942 it was announced that the school would be closed in order that the Manhattan Project could be carried out there...What angered her chiefly was the research on the atomic bomb and its testing and use...Church became a pacifist, and in 1948 she and her husband joined the Society of Friends." - Southwestern Women Writers and the Vision of Goodness
Created by Silver seren (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 117 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

SilverserenC 20:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article that was moved to mainspace on 7 May 2024‎ is 7,830 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 161 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. AGF book for ref 1 (verifying the hook) which has no preview available but can still be searched (all three quotes check out). QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 8[edit]

Brad Banducci

(
)
Moved to mainspace by GMH Melbourne (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was moved to mainspace today, so is new enough. At just over 1800 characters, it is long enough. The article properly uses in-line citations and the copyvio detector finds nothing outside of groups and positions. The hook is interesting and cited inline. The QPQ has been done. The only thing I'll note is that there's certainly sources out there to beef up the article more, including recent contempt threats and just older general news articles about him. Anyways, looks good to go. SilverserenC 00:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Wilson (Arkansas politician)

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by QuicoleJR (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

QuicoleJR (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Article seems in a good enough state all around. The hook checks out and is certainly good enough; I might mentioned that he was reelected to the house afterwards though! Left some comments on the talk on how this article might be improved or expanded. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

69 (number)

(
)
  • ... that the number 69 is nice?
Improved to Good Article status by LunaEatsTuna (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 21:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: A very nice GA and hook. Hopefully the approvers will accept ALT0. Skyshiftertalk 22:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 would need quotes for "nice" (and if I had my way, the whole hook would be "that 69 is "nice"").--Launchballer 01:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 9[edit]

Sikidy

(
)
A Malagasy diviner performs sikidy in 1900
A Malagasy diviner performs sikidy in 1900
Created by Zanahary (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Zanahary (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article new enough and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is quite interesting, cited inline, and verified. Image appropriately licensed. I'd suggest linking "people" in the hook to Malagasy peoples, but otherwise GTG.Pseud 14 (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barron Trump

(
)
Barron Trump
Barron Trump
Converted from a redirect by ElijahPepe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • I will review this nomination. GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article is new enough (created from redirect on 10 May 2024‎), long enough, copyvio-free, and policy compliant. The hook is cited by a reliable source and is interesting. The image is in the public domain, used in the article, and is clear at 140x140px. QPQ not required. Only issue is that the lede section is too short. There are a few areas in the article that are yet to be addressed in the lede so fixing that should be only a small fix. — GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here We Go... Again

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by AskeeaeWiki (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Great work on the article, AskeeaeWiki! I do love the hook, with The Weeknd claiming that he could make his lover scream like a horror genre actress? That's wild! Anyway, there's just one issue that I have – there's a Distractify source used in the article, which is considered unreliable; I feel like there could be a more reliable source out there that verifies the fact that he "repeatedly tells his partner that he is willing to marry if she signs a prenuptial agreement, to keep his assets if they separate". Other than that, I have no other concerns, and happy to approve afterward. Thanks! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That'll do it! Great work on the article. :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 12:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German Mission House

(
)
German Mission House
German Mission House
  • ... that over the course of several decades, the missionaries of German Mission House (pictured) failed to convert a single person?
Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 46 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was created on the same day as nomination. Article meets adequate quality standards and contains enough prose for DYK, my only suggestions are for "the western end of the building" to be potentially reworded just due to similarity in the source, and for the double space in the 'History' section to be fixed. Very interesting hook! I took a look at the source and I noticed that it had mentioned "Moriori, Maori, or Pakeha" (meaning the missionaries failed to convert Indigenous or European New Zealanders) and I'm wondering if this, or the fact that this took place in New Zealand, would be worth mentioning in the hook as well. Picture is relevant to the hook. QPQ done. Great work on the article! Please ping when concerns have been addressed. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, good catch! Fixed this in the article. For the hook, I generally try to condense the hooks as much as I can, but. ALT1": ... that over the course of several decades, the missionaries of New Zealand's German Mission House (pictured) failed to convert a single person?" could work! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 00:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I just wanted to suggest any sort of inclusion of New Zealand in the hook so that there wouldn't be any confusion with the building having "German" in its name. Good to go now. :) B3251 (talk) 01:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 10[edit]

Xenophon of Robeika

(
)
  • Source: Ankudinov, I. Yu. (2016). Ксенофонтов Робейский Николаевский монастырь [Xenophon Robeysky Nikolaevsky Monastery]. Novgorod Archive Bulletin. Vol. 13. Veliky Novgorod. pp. 83–84.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
5x expanded by Evrik (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 116 past nominations.

--evrik (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Wow, I love this hook. Article is long enough and 5x expanded as of today, Earwig finds no copyvio, sourcing looks good and I'm AGFing on the languages I can't read (DeepL translation shows me it lines up). Hook is cited, again AGF because I can't be certain, given that I can't read Russian, and your QPQ is good. Zanahary (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) -->[reply]

Tad's Steaks

(
)
  • ... that Tad's Steaks offered "tasty food, low prices, service with a grunt"?
Created by RoySmith (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 38 past nominations.

RoySmith (talk) 16:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @RoySmith: Nice work. There is only one issue with this nomination, which I've mentioned above. Epicgenius (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, NY Post references removed, thanks for the review. RoySmith (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go now. Epicgenius (talk) 20:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Epicgenius I hope you don't mind, but I've done a bit more work on this since your review. Please let me know if I've introduced any new issues. RoySmith (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RoySmith: Thanks for the heads up. You cite this Forbes contributor blog (which is not really reliable per WP:FORBESCON), but it's used for commentary and not for factual info. I see no other issues. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ola Labib

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 228 past nominations.

Launchballer 18:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough. Earwig detects 51.6% match due to a cited passage in the article so that is not a problem. Quotes that result in a match are cited. The hooks are cited and are interesting. Preference for ALT0 and ALT2. QPQ has been completed! Great work, cheers! Ornithoptera (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yangliujie Catholic Church

(
)
The façade of the church
The façade of the church
  • Source: See Huang, Xian (2021-01-30). 遵义会议会址确认记 [Confirmation of the Site of the Zunyi Conference]. People's Daily Overseas Edition 人民日报海外版 (in Chinese). or Pan, Kaimao (2012). 遵义会议期间红军总政治部旧址简介 [Site of the Political Directorate of the Chinese Red Army during the Zunyi Conference]. Zhongguo Diming 中国地名. No. 05. p. 13..
Created by TheLonelyPather (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 11:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, presentable, well-sourced, no copyvio, hook cited and QPQ done. Uriel1022 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Warde

(
)
  • ... that actress Shirley Warde first began starring in play productions at the age of six?
Created by Silver seren (talk) and FloridaArmy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 118 past nominations.

SilverserenC 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Looks good to me, long enough, new enough, good sourcing and well written. I think ALT1 is more interesting as a hook. Luiysia (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simon de Graaff

(
)
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 662 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Date, length, hook, qpq, earwig close paraphrase check works out. I prefer the main hook over ALT1. --Soman (talk) 11:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 11[edit]

Alexei Starobinsky

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Sgubaldo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Sgubaldo (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

St. Anne's Church, Moxi

(
)
Side view of the church
Side view of the church
  • Reviewed:
Created by Uriel1022 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Uriel1022 (talk) 05:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, very well-sourced, copy-right compliant (Earwig 7.4%), very presentable. Hook is interesting. Images are properly licensed. No QPQ necessary. Foreign sources AGF. (I put some further comment on the talk page; they're not related to the DYK criteria, but may be helpful.) Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 19:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 12[edit]

Rachel Brem

(
)
Doctor Rachel F. Brem
Doctor Rachel F. Brem
  • ... that Rachel Brem (pictured) discovered a tumor in her own breast while testing ultrasound equipment for her hospital?
Moved to mainspace by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 82 past nominations.

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 17:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new and long enough. Its neutral, BLP-compliant, and is copyvio-free (the 51.9% result from Earwig appears to be the list of publications, not copied prose). Hook is good, sourced in the Early life and education section with an inline citation. Image is used in the article's infobox and is correctly licensed. QPQ has been done. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tori DellaPeruta, Talia DellaPeruta

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)
Talia and Tori DellaPeruta
Talia and Tori DellaPeruta
Created by Hameltion (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 55 past nominations.

Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great Genna Martyrdom

(
)
Painting of the martyrdom in the Church of the Gesù (Rome)
Painting of the martyrdom in the Church of the Gesù (Rome)
Source: Roldán-Figueroa, Rady (2021). "Background: Catholic Missions in Japan". The Martyrs of Japan: Publication History and Catholic Missions in the Spanish World (Spain, New Spain, and the Philippines, 1597–1700). Studies in the History of Christian Traditions. Vol. 195. Brill. pp. 13–34. doi:10.1163/9789004458062. ISBN 978-90-04-45806-2.

"Twenty- seven Japanese laymen and laywomen were executed in addition to four Koreans; five of the victims were children

between 3 and 12 years of age.136"
Created by WatkynBassett (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

WatkynBassett (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. AGF on the offline hook ALT0 source and that you will complete the QPQ you started. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Liszt

(
)
  • ... that Franz Liszt's female admirers would fight over his cigar stubs and coffee dregs as souvenirs?
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Ligaturama (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Ligaturama (talk) 07:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Excellent work! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 11:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 13[edit]

Zombie Plane

(
)
Created by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Reviewing... (I haven't heard a Chuck Norris meme in years) ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 17:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Passed criteria: The article is new enough, long enough, not affected by DYK-eligibility problems, verifiable and NOR, copyvio-free with correctly attributed quotes. The hook is cited to RS, interesting, concise.
  • Remarks, @Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: (1) I think the Premise section should be rewritten to not give undue weight to THR. (2) William Strong did not directly tell THR of the biohazard threads but rather told Mier who forwarded the story. (3) This might be a language issue from my part, but should the hook not be
    ALT0b: ... that Zombie Plane cannot take flight from Chuck Norris?
  • as in the movie cannot flee/escape from Chuck Norris? Also, I removed the link to the Chuck Norris facts article to add a little IYKYK. You are welcome to retain the original link. Best wishes, ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 18:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC); 18:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Lol1VNIO: Thanks for taking this review. Your concerns have been addressed. I also welcome your minor revision on ALT0, which is more clear than the previous version, tho I think the decision whether to include that Norris fact wikilink is probably best left for a DYK prepper to decide. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BBL Drizzy

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by Liance (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

~Liancetalk 21:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Earwig's clear, long enough, new enough, sourced well, and gtg. The Graun really needs to get its reporting up though, "Metro did something that had yet to be done in this rap battle: he apologized" might be the most damning indictment of J Cole's role in the beef I've seen. AryKun (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 14[edit]

Arthur Fulton (sport shooter)

(
)
Created by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

UndercoverClassicist T·C 06:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • GTG. Interesting and well-written GA, main hook checks out, AGF on the ALT1. Earwig finds nothing, QPQ done. Johnbod (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Izzy Scane

(
)
Created by Hameltion (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 57 past nominations.

Hameltion (talk | contribs) 22:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daxinzhuang, Frederick Seguier Drake

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)
Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 47 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 07:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Both article need end-of-sentence cites for the fact of him discovering the city. The source confirms the claim ("He discovered the Shang deposits at Daxinzhuang"). The source is a doctoral dissertation, but it seems to have a decent number of citations according to Scholar, so I think it's fine to use. Earwig's clear for both articles and no other issues I can see, so gtg once the end-of-sentence cites are added. AryKun (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know/Approved&oldid=1224019737"